Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21045544›Full record

ReviewRNA biology

Taming free energy landscapes with RNA chaperones.

Sarah A Woodson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FRET-guided selection of RNA 3D structures.Nucleic acids research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Moderate activity of RNA chaperone maximizes the yield of self-spliced pre-RNA in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. How does RNA fold dynamically?Journal of molecular biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Detection ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah A WoodsonT. C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. swoodson@jhu.edu

Funding

Role of Exon Structure in Splicing of Group I IntronsR01GM046686 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PK CAMPUS · PI WOODSON, SARAH A. · 1992 to 2014
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many non-coding RNAs fold into complex three-dimensional structures, yet the self-assembly of RNA structure is hampered by mispairing, weak tertiary interactions, electrostatic barriers, and the frequent requirement that the 5' and 3' ends of the transcript interact. This rugged free energy landscape for RNA folding means that some RNA molecules in a population rapidly form their native structure, while many others become kinetically trapped in misfolded conformations. Transient binding of RNA chaperone proteins destabilize misfolded intermediates and lower the transition states between conformations, producing a smoother landscape that increases the rate of folding and the probability that a molecule will find the native structure. DEAD-box proteins couple the chemical potential of ATP hydrolysis with repetitive cycles of RNA binding and release, expanding the range of conditions under which they can refold RNA structures.

Indexed as

HumansKineticsMolecular ChaperonesProtein BindingRNARNA, CatalyticStatic ElectricityThermodynamicsTranscription, GeneticMolecular ChaperonesRNARNA, Catalytic

Identifiers

PMID21045544
PMCPMC3073327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.