Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21045125›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Central gating of fly optomotor response.

Juergen Haag, Adrian Wertz, Alexander Borst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neural control and precision of flight muscle activation in Drosophila.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complementary motion tuning in frontal nerve motor neurons of the blowfly.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  17. Cellular mechanisms for integral feedback in visually guided behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  18. Saccadic body turns in walking Drosophila.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juergen HaagDepartment of Systems and Computational Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany. haag@neuro.mpg.de
Adrian Wertz
Alexander Borst
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the integration of multisensory and central input at the level of an identified fly motoneuron, the ventral cervical nerve motoneuron (VCNM) cell, which controls head movements of the animal. We show that this neuron receives input from a central neuron signaling flight activity, from two identified wide-field motion-sensitive neurons, from the wind-sensitive Johnston organ on the antennae, and from the campaniform sensillae of the halteres. We find that visual motion alone leads to only subthreshold responses. Only when it is combined with flight activity or wind stimuli does the VCNM respond to visual motion by modulating its spike activity in a directionally selective way. This nonlinear enhancement of visual responsiveness in the VCNM by central activity is reflected at the behavioral level, when compensatory head movements are measured in response to visual motion. While head movements of flies have only a small amplitude when flies are at rest, the response amplitude is increased by a factor of 30-40 during flight.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiotinDipteraElectricityMotion PerceptionMotor ActivityMotor NeuronsMusclesPhysical StimulationVisual PathwaysWindBiotinneurobiotin

Identifiers

PMID21045125
PMCPMC2993391
OpenAlexW2032192688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.