Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21045099›Full record

ArticleJAMA2010

Prediction of 6-month survival of nursing home residents with advanced dementia using ADEPT vs hospice eligibility guidelines.

Susan L Mitchell, Susan C Miller, Joan M Teno, Dan K Kiely, Roger B Davis, Michele L Shaffer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03485898 (Patient Outcomes After an Hospitalization in the Specialized Cognitive-behavioral Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 114 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03485898 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Patient Outcomes After an Hospitalization in the Specialized Cognitive-behavioral Unit (UCC) of Toulon

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur MerRan2018 to 2019Enrolled58ConditionsBehavior Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predicting hospice eligibility among dementia patients using language models.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Our Patients Want to Die at Home. Are They Prepared for It?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan L MitchellThe Hebrew Senior Life, Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan C Miller
Joan M Teno
Dan K Kiely
Roger B Davis
Michele L Shaffer
Brown University · USHarvard University Press · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG033640 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI MITCHELL, SUSAN L · 2009 to 2018
$1.8M
The ADEPT Study: Estimating Prognosis in Advanced DementiaR01AG028423 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI MITCHELL, SUSAN L · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG033640NIA NIH HHS K24AG033640NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEstimating life expectancy is challenging in advanced dementia, potentially limiting the use of hospice care in these patients.

objectiveTo prospectively validate and compare the performance of the Advanced Dementia Prognostic Tool (ADEPT) and hospice eligibility guidelines to estimate 6-month survival in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA prospective cohort study conducted in 21 nursing homes in Boston, Massachusetts, of 606 residents with advanced dementia who were recruited between November 1, 2007, and July 30, 2009. Data were ascertained at baseline to determine the residents' ADEPT score (range, 1.0-32.5; higher scores indicate worse prognosis) and whether they met Medicare hospice eligibility guidelines. Survival was followed up to 6 months.

main outcome measuresAssessment and comparison of the performance of the ADEPT score and hospice guidelines to predict 6-month survival using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.

resultsAt baseline, the residents' mean (SD) ADEPT score was 10.1 (3.1) points and 65 residents (10.7%) met hospice eligibility guidelines. Over 6 months, 111 residents (18.3%) died. The AUROC for the ADEPT score's prediction of 6-month mortality as a continuous variable was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.72). The AUROC for Medicare hospice eligibility guidelines was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.51-0.59), the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92), and the sensitivity was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.13-0.28). Using a cutoff of 13.5 on the ADEPT score, which also had specificity of 0.89, the AUROC was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.54-0.63) and the sensitivity was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.19-0.36).

conclusionsWhen prospectively validated at the bedside and used as a continuous measure, the ability of the ADEPT score to identify nursing home residents with advanced dementia at high risk of death within 6 months was modest, albeit better than hospice eligibility guidelines. Care provided to these residents should be guided by their goals of care rather than estimated life expectancy.

Indexed as

Eligibility DeterminationHospice CareNursing HomesSeverity of Illness IndexAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMedicarePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21045099
PMCPMC3017367
OpenAlexW1984367196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.