Integrative biology of renal disease: toward a holistic understanding of the kidney's function and failure.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Integrative Biology of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
   Article
2. The kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis: is it still relevant?Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2014
   Article
3. Ten-year advances in immunopathology of glomerulonephritis: translated into patients' care or lost in translation?Seminars in immunopathology · 2014
   Article
4. Design of the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) to evaluate primary glomerular nephropathy by a multidisciplinary approach.Kidney international · 2013
   Article
5. From the Large Scale Expression Analysis of Lupus Nephritis to Targeted Molecular Medicine.Journal of data mining in genomics & proteomics · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as