ArticleBiophysical journal2010
TASSER_WT: a protein structure prediction algorithm with accurate predicted contact restraints for difficult protein targets.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Protein Homology Detection Propelled by Inter-Residue Interaction Map Threading.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- MELD × MD Folds Nonthreadables, Giving Native Structures and Populations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018Article
- Why Is There a Glass Ceiling for Threading Based Protein Structure Prediction Methods?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2017Article
- On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.Israel journal of chemistry · 2014Article
- Probabilistic grammatical model for helix-helix contact site classification.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2013Article
- Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2012Article
- Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To improve the prediction accuracy in the regime where template alignment quality is poor, an updated version of TASSER_2.0, namely TASSER_WT, was developed. TASSER_WT incorporates more accurate contact restraints from a new method, COMBCON. COMBCON uses confidence-weighted contacts from PROSPECTOR_3.5, the latest version, PROSPECTOR_4, and a new local structural fragment-based threading algorithm, STITCH, implemented in two variants depending on expected fragment prediction accuracy. TASSER_WT is tested on 622 Hard proteins, the most difficult targets (incorrect alignments and/or templates and incorrect side-chain contact restraints) in a comprehensive benchmark of 2591 nonhomologous, single domain proteins ≤ 200 residues that cover the PDB at 35% pairwise sequence identity. For 454 of 622 Hard targets, COMBCON provides contact restraints with higher accuracy and number of contacts per residue. As contact coverage with confidence weight ≥ 3 (F(wt ≥ 3)(cov)) increases, the more improved are TASSER_WT models. When F(wt ≥ 3)(cov) > 1.0 and > 0.4, the average root mean-square deviation of TASSER_WT (TASSER_2.0) models is 4.11 Å (6.72 Å) and 5.03 Å (6.40 Å), respectively. Regarding a structure prediction as successful when a model has a TM-score to the native structure ≥ 0.4, when F(wt ≥ 3)(cov) > 1.0 and > 0.4, the success rate of TASSER_WT (TASSER_2.0) is 98.8% (76.2%) and 93.7% (81.1%), respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.