ArticleBiophysical journal2010
Self-assembly of rationally designed peptides under two-dimensional confinement.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective.The AAPS journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rational design of interfacially confined biomolecules offers a unique opportunity to explore the cooperative relationship among self-assembly, nucleation, and growth processes. This article highlights the role of electrostatics in the self-assembly of β-sheet-forming peptides at the air-water interface. We characterize the phase behavior of a periodically sequenced sheet-forming peptide by using Langmuir techniques, Brewster angle microscopy, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and circular dichroism spectroscopy. We find that peptides with an alternating binary sequence transition at high pressures from discrete circular domains to fibrous domains. The qualitative behavior is independent of surface pressure but dependent on molecular areas. In addition, thermodynamic models are employed to specifically quantify differences in electrostatics by obtaining parameters for the critical aggregation area, the limiting molecular area, and the dimensionless ratio of line tension/dipole density. Using these parameters, we are able to relate localized charge distribution to phase transitions, which will allow us to apply these molecules to examine how the dynamics of self-assembly can be directly coupled to the formation of composite nanostructures in biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.