Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21044568›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

A mathematical framework for analyzing T cell receptor scanning of peptides.

Andreas Jansson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas JanssonInfofusion, Systems Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden. andreas.jansson@his.se
University of Skövde · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells continuously search for antigenic peptides presented on major histocompatibility complexes expressed on nearly all nucleated cells. Because only a few antigenic peptides are presented in a sea of thousands of self-peptides, the T cells have a critical task in discriminating between self- and nonself-peptides. This search process for antigens must be performed with sufficient speed in order to induce a fast response against invading pathogens. This study presents a mathematical framework for analyzing the scanning process of peptides. The framework includes analytic expressions for calculating the sampling rate as well as continuous-systems- and stochastic-agent-based models. The results show that the scanning of self-peptides is a very fast process due to fast off-rates. The simulations also predict the existence of an optimal sampling rate for a certain range of on-rates based on the recently proposed confinement time model. Calculations reveal that most of the self-peptides located within a microdomain are scanned within just a few seconds, and that the T cell receptors have kinetics for self-peptides, facilitating fast scanning. The derived mathematical expressions within this study provide conceptual calculations for further investigations of how the T cell discriminates between self- and nonself-peptides.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAntigensAutoantigensBiophysical PhenomenaHLA AntigensHumansKineticsLymphocyte ActivationPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesT-LymphocytesAntigensAutoantigensHLA AntigensPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID21044568
PMCPMC2966000
OpenAlexW2080250171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.