ArticleBiophysical journal2010
A mathematical framework for analyzing T cell receptor scanning of peptides.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Visualizing Surface T-Cell Receptor Dynamics Four-Dimensionally Using Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020Article
- Co-Receptor CD8-Mediated Modulation of T-Cell Receptor Functional Sensitivity and Epitope Recognition Degeneracy.Frontiers in immunology · 2013Review
- Kinetic proofreading and the search for nonself-peptides.Self/nonself · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T cells continuously search for antigenic peptides presented on major histocompatibility complexes expressed on nearly all nucleated cells. Because only a few antigenic peptides are presented in a sea of thousands of self-peptides, the T cells have a critical task in discriminating between self- and nonself-peptides. This search process for antigens must be performed with sufficient speed in order to induce a fast response against invading pathogens. This study presents a mathematical framework for analyzing the scanning process of peptides. The framework includes analytic expressions for calculating the sampling rate as well as continuous-systems- and stochastic-agent-based models. The results show that the scanning of self-peptides is a very fast process due to fast off-rates. The simulations also predict the existence of an optimal sampling rate for a certain range of on-rates based on the recently proposed confinement time model. Calculations reveal that most of the self-peptides located within a microdomain are scanned within just a few seconds, and that the T cell receptors have kinetics for self-peptides, facilitating fast scanning. The derived mathematical expressions within this study provide conceptual calculations for further investigations of how the T cell discriminates between self- and nonself-peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.