Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21044317›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2010

Early career choices and successful career progression in surgery in the UK: prospective cohort studies.

Michael J Goldacre, Louise Laxton, Ewen M Harrison, Jennifer M J Richards, Trevor W Lambert, Rowan W Parks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Status of Otorhinolaryngology as Specialty of Choice Among Female Medical Graduates.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Influences on students' career decisions concerning general practice: a focus group study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is the culture of surgery still a gender issue?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael J GoldacreUK Medical Careers Research Group, Department of Public Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK. michael.goldacre@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Louise Laxton
Ewen M Harrison
Jennifer M J Richards
Trevor W Lambert
Rowan W Parks

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges to the structure of medical training worldwide require doctors to decide on their career specialty at an increasingly early stage after graduation. We studied trends in career choices for surgery, and the eventual career destinations, of UK graduates who declared an early preference for surgery.

methodsPostal questionnaires were sent, at regular time intervals after qualification, to all medical qualifiers from all UK medical schools in selected qualification years between 1974 and 2005. They were sent in the first year after qualification, at year three and five years after qualification, and at longer time intervals thereafter.

resultsResponses were received from 27,749 of 38,280 doctors (73%) at year one, 23,468 of 33,151 (71%) at year three, and 17,689 of 24,870 (71%) at year five. Early career preferences showed that surgery has become more popular over the past two decades. Looking forward from early career choice, 60% of respondents (64% of men, 48% of women) with a first preference for a surgical specialty at year one eventually worked in surgery (p < 0.001 for the male-female comparison). Looking backward from eventual career destinations, 90% of responders working in surgery had originally specified a first choice for a surgical specialty at year one. 'Match' rates between eventual destinations and early choices were much higher for surgery than for other specialties. Considering factors that influenced early specialty choice 'a great deal', comparing aspiring surgeons and aspiring general practitioners (GPs), a significantly higher percentage who chose surgery than general practice specified enthusiasm for the specialty (73% vs. 53%), a particular teacher or department (34% vs. 12%), inclinations before medical school (20% vs. 11%), and future financial prospects (24% vs. 13%); and a lower percentage specified that hours and working conditions had influenced their choice (21% vs. 71%). Women choosing surgery were influenced less than men by their inclinations before medical school or by their future financial prospects.

conclusionsSurgery is a popular specialty choice in the UK. The great majority of doctors who progressed in a surgical career made an early and definitive decision to do so.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceGeneral SurgeryAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCareer MobilityFemaleHumansMalePhysiciansProspective StudiesStudents, MedicalUnited KingdomWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID21044317
PMCPMC2987756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.