Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21044298›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2010

Micro ecosystems from feed industry surfaces: a survival and biofilm study of Salmonella versus host resident flora strains.

Olivier Habimana, Trond Møretrø, Solveig Langsrud, Lene K Vestby, Live L Nesse, Even Heir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mitigation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Combined Effect of Temperature and Relative Humidity on the Survival ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pet Food Factory Isolates ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier HabimanaNofima Mat AS, Osloveien, Ås, Norway. olivier.habimana@nofima.no
Trond Møretrø
Solveig Langsrud
Lene K Vestby
Live L Nesse
Even Heir
Fafo Foundation · NONofima · NONorwegian Veterinary Institute · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of Salmonella enterica serovars in feed ingredients, products and processing facilities is a well recognized problem worldwide. In Norwegian feed factories, strict control measures are implemented to avoid establishment and spreading of Salmonella throughout the processing chain. There is limited knowledge on the presence and survival of the resident microflora in feed production plants. Information on interactions between Salmonella and other bacteria in feed production plants and how they affect survival and biofilm formation of Salmonella is also limited. The aim of this study was to identify resident microbiota found in feed production environments, and to compare the survival of resident flora strains and Salmonella to stress factors typically found in feed processing environments. Moreover, the role of dominant resident flora strains in the biofilm development of Salmonella was determined.

resultsSurface microflora characterization from two feed productions plants, by means of 16 S rDNA sequencing, revealed a wide diversity of bacteria. Survival, disinfection and biofilm formation experiments were conducted on selected dominant resident flora strains and Salmonella. Results showed higher survival properties by resident flora isolates for desiccation, and disinfection compared to Salmonella isolates. Dual-species biofilms favored Salmonella growth compared to Salmonella in mono-species biofilms, with biovolume increases of 2.8-fold and 3.2-fold in the presence of Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas, respectively.

conclusionsThese results offer an overview of the microflora composition found in feed industry processing environments, their survival under relevant stresses and their potential effect on biofilm formation in the presence of Salmonella. Eliminating the establishment of resident flora isolates in feed industry surfaces is therefore of interest for impeding conditions for Salmonella colonization and growth on feed industry surfaces. In-depth investigations are still needed to determine whether resident flora has a definite role in the persistence of Salmonella in feed processing environments.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiofilmsEcosystemFood MicrobiologyAnimal FeedBacteriaDisinfectantsEnvironmentNorwayRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalmonella entericaDisinfectantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID21044298
PMCPMC2989951
OpenAlexW2140920694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.