ArticleFaraday discussions2010
The search for the hydrophobic force law.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring Molecular Forces With Atomic Force Microscopy 1: Solvent Influence on Hydrophobic Interactions.Microscopy research and technique · 2026Review
- Measuring Colloidal Forces With Atomic Force Microscopy 1: Salt Influence on Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions.Microscopy research and technique · 2025Review
- Solvation Forces Near Hydrophobic Surfaces: A Classical Density Functional Theory Study.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Role of Hydrophobic Associations in Self-Healing Hydrogels Based on Amphiphilic Polysaccharides.Polymers · 2023Review
- A Roadmap for Building Waterborne Virus Traps.JACS Au · 2022Review
- Hydropathicity-based prediction of pain-causing NaV1.7 variants.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Non-extensitivity and criticality of atomic hydropathicity around a voltage-gated sodium channel's pore: a modeling study.Journal of biological physics · 2021Article
- Nanoconfined water can orient and cause long-range dipolar interactions with biomolecules.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Crystallization, structural diversity and anisotropy effects in 2D arrays of icosahedral viruses.Soft matter · 2013Article
- Structure, folding dynamics, and amyloidogenesis of D76N β2-microglobulin: roles of shear flow, hydrophobic surfaces, and α-crystallin.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After nearly 30 years of research on the hydrophobic interaction, the search for the hydrophobic force law is still continuing. Indeed, there are more questions than answers, and the experimental data are often quite different for nominally similar conditions, as well as, apparently, for nano-, micro-, and macroscopic surfaces. This has led to the conclusion that the experimentally observed force-distance relationships are either a combination of different 'fundamental' interactions, or that the hydrophobic force-law, if there is one, is complex--depending on numerous parameters. The only unexpectedly strong attractive force measured in all experiments so far has a range of D approximately 100-200 angstroms, increasing roughly exponentially down to approximately 10-20 angstroms and then more steeply down to adhesive contact at D = 0 or, for power-law potentials, effectively at D approximately 2 angstroms. The measured forces in this regime (100-200 angstroms) and especially the adhesive forces are much stronger, and have a different distance-dependence from the continuum VDW force (Lifshitz theory) for non-conducting dielectric media. We suggest a three-regime force-law for the forces observed between hydrophobic surfaces: In the first, from 100-200 angstroms to thousands of angstroms, the dominating force is created by complementary electrostatic domains or patches on the apposing surfaces and/or bridging vapour cavities; a 'pure' but still not well-understood 'long-range hydrophobic force' dominates the second regime from approximately 150 to approximately 15 angstroms, possibly due to an enhanced Hamaker constant associated with the 'proton-hopping' polarizability of water; while below approximately 10-15 anstroms to contact there is another 'pure short-range hydrophobic force' related to water structuring effects associated with surface-induced changes in the orientation and/or density of water molecules and H-bonds at the water-hydrophobic interface. We present recent SFA and other experimental results, as well as a simplified model for water based on a spherically-symmetric potential that is able to capture some basic features of hydrophobic association. Such a model may be useful for theoretical studies of the HI over the broad range of scales observed in SFA experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.