ArticleCurrent allergy and asthma reports2011
Perspectives on anaphylaxis epidemiology in the United States with new data and analyses.
Article in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Methods of Identifying Anaphylaxis for Medical Product Safety Surveillance Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.American journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Active surveillance and clinical analysis of anaphylaxis based on the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Incidence and trends of limb amputation in first nations and general population in Saskatchewan, 2006-2019.PloS one · 2021Article
- Association Between Use of Acid-Suppressive Medications and Antibiotics During Infancy and Allergic Diseases in Early Childhood.JAMA pediatrics · 2018Article
- The Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018Review
- Outpatient Emergencies: Anaphylaxis.The Medical clinics of North America · 2017Review
- Case fatality and population mortality associated with anaphylaxis in the United States.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2014Article
- Latitude, sunlight, vitamin D, and childhood food allergy/anaphylaxis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2012Review
- A population-based epidemiologic study of emergency department visits for anaphylaxis in Florida.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaphylaxis incidence rates and time trends in the United States have been reported using different data sources and selection methods. Larger studies using diagnostic coding have inherent limitations in sensitivity and specificity. In contrast, smaller studies using chart reviews, including reports from single institutions, have better case characterization but suffer from reduced external validity due to their restricted nature. Increasing anaphylaxis hospitalization rates since the 1990s have been reported abroad. However, we report no significant overall increase in the United States. There have been several reports of increasing anaphylaxis rates in northern populations in the United States, especially in younger people, lending support to the suggestion that higher anaphylaxis rates occur at higher latitudes. We analyzed anaphylaxis hospitalization rates in comparably sized northern (New York) and southern (Florida) states and found significant time trend differences based on age. This suggests that the relationship of latitude to anaphylaxis incidence is complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.