ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2011
Neurocritical care of a reperfused brain.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms Underlying Curcumin-Induced Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Hemodynamic Versus Anatomic Assessment of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis: the Relationship Between Pressure Wire Translesional Gradient and Angiographic Lesion Geometry.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Fatal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage From Ruptured Intracerebral Aneurysm After Carotid Endarterectomy.Journal of medical cases · 2020Article
- Targeted temperature management in traumatic brain injury.Journal of intensive care · 2016Review
- Septic encephalopathy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2013Review
- Preconditioning for traumatic brain injury.Translational stroke research · 2013Review
- The Use of Hypothermia Therapy in Traumatic Ischemic / Reperfusional Brain Injury: Review of the Literatures.Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral hyperperfusion and reperfusion injuries are not infrequently encountered following in reperfusion of ischemic or hypoperfused brain. Mechanism of injury could be related to tissue plasminogen activator toxicity, oxidative stress, and hyperperfusion due to impaired cerebral autoregulation in already maximally dilated cerebral vasculature and compromised cerebral hemodynamic reserve. Reperfusion injury can present as headaches and seizures in mild forms and as subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and encephalopathy in its most severe manifestation. Prevention and identifying those at risk of hyperperfusion syndromes are the best strategy. Active treatment includes basic neurocritical care with reduction of blood pressure to a reperfused brain and timely neuroprotection and cerebral edema control measures are the mainstay of its management approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.