Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21042853›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011

The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing.

Chang Soo Eun, Dong Soo Han, Yil Sik Hyun, Joong Ho Bae, Hye Sun Park, Tae Yeob Kim, Yong Cheol Jeon, Joo Hyun Sohn

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02547571 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Bowel CLEAnsing: A National Initiative

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlan BarkunRan2016 to 2018Enrolled3,476ConditionsSubjets Requiring a ColonoscopyArmsHigh volume PEG split-dose, Low volume PEG split-dose, High volume PEG non split, day before, Low volume PEG non split, same day, Clear liquid diet
NCT04093557 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Validation of a Novel Clinical Prediction Scoring System for Improved Bowel Preparation Prior to Outpatient Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsColonic Polyp, Colon CancerArmsOrton Score, Typical Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effect of Bowel Preparation to Colonoscopy Interval on Preparation Quality and Colonoscopy Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Training in Endoscopy: Colonoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chang Soo EunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Dong Soo Han
Yil Sik Hyun
Joong Ho Bae
Hye Sun Park
Tae Yeob Kim
Yong Cheol Jeon
Joo Hyun Sohn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe aimed to compare the quality of bowel preparation and cecal intubation rates between morning and afternoon colonoscopies and to evaluate the difference in quality of bowel preparation according to the intervals between starting and ending intake of bowel preparation agent and the initiation of colonoscopy.

methodsIn this prospective study, 300 outpatients were instructed to drink PEG solution starting either at 5:00 a.m. (morning group) or at 8:00 a.m. (afternoon group) on the same day. The time when PEG intake was started and completed, and when colonoscopy was begun were recorded. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the Ottawa scale between the morning and the afternoon groups (p = 0.14). Patients with intervals of 7 h or less between the initiation of PEG intake and the start of colonoscopy had a better quality of bowel preparation than those with intervals of more than 7 h (p = 0.03). In addition, patients with intervals of 4 h or less between the end of PEG intake and the start of colonoscopy had a better quality of bowel preparation than those with intervals of more than 4 h (p = 0.02).

conclusionsThe time of day at which colonoscopy is performed, whether during the morning or the afternoon, does not have a significant impact on the quality of bowel preparation. The quality of bowel preparation is significantly better in patients with a shorter time between bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppointments and SchedulesCatharticsDrug Administration ScheduleHumansMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsCatharticsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.