ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2010
Types of neural guides and using nanotechnology for peripheral nerve reconstruction.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury-State of the Art.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Advancements in autologous peripheral nerve transplantation care: a review of strategies and practices to facilitate recovery.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- How Advancing is Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Using Nanofiber Scaffolds? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Bridging potential of Taurine-loading PCL conduits transplanted with hEnSCs on resected sciatic nerves.Regenerative therapy · 2022Article
- Teratological effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mice embryo.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Repairing sciatic nerve injury with self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold-containing chitosan conduit.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Temporal changes in the spinal cord transcriptome after peripheral nerve injury.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
- Novel electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/type I collagen nanofiber conduits for repair of peripheral nerve injury.Neural regeneration research · 2019Article
- Electrophysiological assessment of a peptide amphiphile nanofiber nerve graft for facial nerve repair.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018Article
- Partially oxidized polyvinyl alcohol conduitfor peripheral nerve regeneration.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Autologous transplantation with fewer fibers repairs large peripheral nerve defects.Neural regeneration research · 2017Article
- Nanotechnology and bio-functionalisation for peripheral nerve regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2015Review
- Tubular Scaffold with Shape Recovery Effect for Cell Guide Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2015Article
- The Effect of Electrospun Gelatin Fibers Alignment on Schwann Cell and Axon Behavior and Organization in the Perspective of Artificial Nerve Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Article
- Biocompatibility and characterization of a peptide amphiphile hydrogel for applications in peripheral nerve regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2015Article
- Sleeve bridging of the rhesus monkey ulnar nerve with muscular branches of the pronator teres: multiple amplification of axonal regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2015Article
- The effects of confinement on neuronal growth cone morphology and velocity.Biomaterials · 2014Article
- Regenerative nanomedicine: current perspectives and future directions.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014Review
- Complementary effects of two growth factors in multifunctionalized silk nanofibers for nerve reconstruction.PloS one · 2014Article
- Efficacy of nanofibrous conduits in repair of long-segment sciatic nerve defects.Neural regeneration research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries can lead to lifetime loss of function and permanent disfigurement. Different methods, such as conventional allograft procedures and use of biologic tubes present problems when used for damaged peripheral nerve reconstruction. Designed scaffolds comprised of natural and synthetic materials are now widely used in the reconstruction of damaged tissues. Utilization of absorbable and nonabsorbable synthetic and natural polymers with unique characteristics can be an appropriate solution to repair damaged nerve tissues. Polymeric nanofibrous scaffolds with properties similar to neural structures can be more effective in the reconstruction process. Better cell adhesion and migration, more guiding of axons, and structural features, such as porosity, provide a clearer role for nanofibers in the restoration of neural tissues. In this paper, basic concepts of peripheral nerve injury, types of artificial and natural guides, and methods to improve the performance of tubes, such as orientation, nanotechnology applications for nerve reconstruction, fibers and nanofibers, electrospinning methods, and their application in peripheral nerve reconstruction are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.