Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21042306›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2011

Antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: the unfinished tale of imperfect success.

D P Kontoyiannis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immune Cell Degranulation in Fungal Host Defence.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bioengineering T cells to target carbohydrate to treat opportunistic fungal infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D P KontoyiannisDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. dkontoyi@mdanderson.org
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients is a rapidly evolving field. For this prophylaxis to be beneficial and cost-effective, the risk of a life-threatening invasive fungal infection (IFI) should outweigh the risks of toxic effects and drug interactions introduced by the antifungal agent used. Not all hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients have the same risk of IFIs. New prophylactic strategies using risk stratification and new broad-spectrum antifungals have the potential for reducing IFI-associated mortality in these patients. Further refinement of risk stratification and risk/benefit analysis (including pharmacoeconomic analysis) is needed. Stratification of IFI risk could be further sharpened based on emerging genetic and metabolic risk factors. However, 10 years after deciphering the human genome, it is unclear whether the genomic revolution would pay off for identifying the SCT recipients at highest risk for IFIs. Empiricism and reliance on institution-specific epidemiologic data are still expected to be a major part of the 'art and science' of risk stratification for fungal infections in SCT.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDrug MonitoringFluconazoleGalactoseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMannansMycosesAntifungal AgentsFluconazolegalactomannanGalactoseMannans

Identifiers

PMID21042306
OpenAlexW2022135481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.