ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2010
Action potential bursts in central snail neurons elicited by paeonol: roles of ionic currents.
Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cellular and Network Mechanisms for Temporal Signal Propagation in a Cortical Network Model.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimto investigate the effects of 2'-hydroxy-4'-methoxyacetophenone (paeonol) on the electrophysiological behavior of a central neuron (right parietal 4; RP4) of the giant African snail (Achatina fulica Ferussac).
methodsintracellular recordings and the two-electrode voltage clamp method were used to study the effects of paeonol on the RP4 neuron.
resultsthe RP4 neuron generated spontaneous action potentials. Bath application of paeonol at a concentration of ≥ 500 micromol/L reversibly elicited action potential bursts in a concentration-dependent manner. Immersing the neurons in Co(2+)-substituted Ca(2+)-free solution did not block paeonol-elicited bursting. Pretreatment with the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor KT-5720 or the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor Ro 31-8220 did not affect the action potential bursts. Voltage-clamp studies revealed that paeonol at a concentration of 500 micromol/L had no remarkable effects on the total inward currents, whereas paeonol decreased the delayed rectifying K(+) current (I(KD)) and the fast-inactivating K(+) current (I(A)). Application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP 5 mmol/L), an inhibitor of I(A), or charybdotoxin 250 nmol/L, an inhibitor of the Ca(2+)-activated K(+) current (I(K(Ca))), failed to elicit action potential bursts, whereas tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA 50 mmol/L), an I(KD) blocker, successfully elicited action potential bursts. At a lower concentration of 5 mmol/L, TEA facilitated the induction of action potential bursts elicited by paeonol.
conclusionpaeonol elicited a bursting firing pattern of action potentials in the RP4 neuron and this activity relates closely to the inhibitory effects of paeonol on the I(KD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.