Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21041555›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Differential maintenance of DNA sequences in telomeric and centromeric heterochromatin.

P G DeBaryshe, Mary-Lou Pardue

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Retrotransposons that maintain chromosome ends.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P G DeBarysheDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Mary-Lou Pardue
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

HET-A, A RETROPOSON WITH A ROLE IN CHROMOSOME STRUCTURER01GM050315 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PARDUE, MARY-LOU · 1995 to 2006
$2.3M
An Evolutionary Link Between Telomeres and TransposonsR56GM050315 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PARDUE, MARY-LOU · 2008 to 2008
$399k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM50315NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050315NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM050315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated DNA in heterochromatin presents enormous difficulties for whole-genome sequencing; hence, sequence organization in a significant portion of the genomes of multicellular organisms is relatively unknown. Two sequenced BACs now allow us to compare telomeric retrotransposon arrays from Drosophila melanogaster telomeres with an array of telomeric retrotransposons that transposed into the centromeric region of the Y chromosome >13 MYA, providing a unique opportunity to compare the structural evolution of this retrotransposon in two contexts. We find that these retrotransposon arrays, both heterochromatic, are maintained quite differently, resulting in sequence organizations that apparently reflect different roles in the two chromosomal environments. The telomere array has grown only by transposition of new elements to the chromosome end; the centromeric array instead has grown by repeated amplifications of segments of the original telomere array. Many elements in the telomere have been variably 5'-truncated apparently by gradual erosion and irregular deletions of the chromosome end; however, a significant fraction (4 and possibly 5 or 6 of 15 elements examined) remain complete and capable of further retrotransposition. In contrast, each element in the centromere region has lost ≥ 40% of its sequence by internal, rather than terminal, deletions, and no element retains a significant part of the original coding region. Thus the centromeric array has been restructured to resemble the highly repetitive satellite sequences typical of centromeres in multicellular organisms, whereas, over a similar or longer time period, the telomere array has maintained its ability to provide retrotransposons competent to extend telomere ends.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentromereDNADrosophila melanogasterHeterochromatinRetroelementsSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionTelomereDNAHeterochromatinRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID21041555
PMCPMC3018307
OpenAlexW2089295306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.