Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21041414›Full record

ReviewGenome research2010

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: more questions than answers.

Lucia Daxinger, Emma Whitelaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transgenerational Impact of Environmental Change.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. DNA Methylation-Associated Epigenetic Changes in Thermotolerance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Professor Emma Whitelaw, a pioneer of epigenetic inheritance.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Abnormal methylation in theQRB discovery · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucia DaxingerEpigenetics Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Emma Whitelaw

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications are widely accepted as playing a critical role in the regulation of gene expression and thereby contributing to the determination of the phenotype of multicellular organisms. In general, these marks are cleared and re-established each generation, but there have been reports in a number of model organisms that at some loci in the genome this clearing is incomplete. This phenomenon is referred to as transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Moreover, recent evidence shows that the environment can stably influence the establishment of the epigenome. Together, these findings suggest that an environmental event in one generation could affect the phenotype in subsequent generations, and these somewhat Lamarckian ideas are stimulating interest from a broad spectrum of biologists, from ecologists to health workers.

Indexed as

EnvironmentEpigenesis, GeneticInheritance PatternsTransgenes

Identifiers

PMID21041414
PMCPMC2989988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.