Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21041215›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Your place or mine? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of marital residence in Indo-European and Austronesian societies.

Laura Fortunato, Fiona Jordan

Abstract readComparative StudyHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
58.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The potential to infer the historical pattern of cultural macroevolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cultural macroevolution matters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Cultural Evolution Approach to Digital Media.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phylogenetic reconstruction of Bantu kinship challenges Main Sequence Theory of human social evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Community differentiation and kinship among Europe's first farmers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Laura FortunatoDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK. l.fortunato@ucl.ac.uk
Fiona Jordan
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate reconstruction of prehistoric social organization is important if we are to put together satisfactory multidisciplinary scenarios about, for example, the dispersal of human groups. Such considerations apply in the case of Indo-European and Austronesian, two large-scale language families that are thought to represent Neolithic expansions. Ancestral kinship patterns have mostly been inferred through reconstruction of kin terminologies in ancestral proto-languages using the linguistic comparative method, and through geographical or distributional arguments based on the comparative patterns of kin terms and ethnographic kinship 'facts'. While these approaches are detailed and valuable, the processes through which conclusions have been drawn from the data fail to provide explicit criteria for systematic testing of alternative hypotheses. Here, we use language trees derived using phylogenetic tree-building techniques on Indo-European and Austronesian vocabulary data. With these trees, ethnographic data and Bayesian phylogenetic comparative methods, we statistically reconstruct past marital residence and infer rates of cultural change between different residence forms, showing Proto-Indo-European to be virilocal and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian uxorilocal. The instability of uxorilocality and the rare loss of virilocality once gained emerge as common features of both families.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonBayes TheoremCultural EvolutionEthnicityFemaleHistory, AncientHousingHumansLinguisticsMaleMarriageModels, TheoreticalPhylogenyWhite People

Identifiers

PMID21041215
PMCPMC2981910
OpenAlexW2116435351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.