Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21041210›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Language shift, bilingualism and the future of Britain's Celtic languages.

Anne Kandler, Roman Unger, James Steele

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Linguistic diversity in a new agenda for equity in science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cultural extinction in evolutionary perspective.Evolutionary human sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modeling language shift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantifying the driving factors for language shift in a bilingual region.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Multilevel processes and cultural adaptation: Examples from past and present small-scale societies.Ecology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability · 2016
    Article
  18. Language extinction and linguistic fronts.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014
    Article
  19. Evolutionary approaches to cultural and linguistic diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne KandlerAHRC Centre for the Evolution of Cultural Diversity, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK. a.kandler@ucl.ac.uk
Roman Unger
James Steele

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Language shift' is the process whereby members of a community in which more than one language is spoken abandon their original vernacular language in favour of another. The historical shifts to English by Celtic language speakers of Britain and Ireland are particularly well-studied examples for which good census data exist for the most recent 100-120 years in many areas where Celtic languages were once the prevailing vernaculars. We model the dynamics of language shift as a competition process in which the numbers of speakers of each language (both monolingual and bilingual) vary as a function both of internal recruitment (as the net outcome of birth, death, immigration and emigration rates of native speakers), and of gains and losses owing to language shift. We examine two models: a basic model in which bilingualism is simply the transitional state for households moving between alternative monolingual states, and a diglossia model in which there is an additional demand for the endangered language as the preferred medium of communication in some restricted sociolinguistic domain, superimposed on the basic shift dynamics. Fitting our models to census data, we successfully reproduce the demographic trajectories of both languages over the past century. We estimate the rates of recruitment of new Scottish Gaelic speakers that would be required each year (for instance, through school education) to counteract the 'natural wastage' as households with one or more Gaelic speakers fail to transmit the language to the next generation informally, for different rates of loss during informal intergenerational transmission.

Indexed as

LanguageMultilingualismCultural EvolutionEmigration and ImmigrationHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansModels, TheoreticalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21041210
PMCPMC2981914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.