Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21041204›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Transmission coupling mechanisms: cultural group selection.

Robert Boyd, Peter J Richerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Half a century of quantitative cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Focal Coordination and Language in Human Evolution.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Human major transitions from the perspective of distributed adaptations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Cultural evolution of conformity and anticonformity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Different perspectives on non-genetic inheritance illustrate the versatile utility of the Price equation in evolutionary biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrative studies of cultural evolution: crossing disciplinary boundaries to produce new insights.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Self-Interest and the Design of Rules.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The reputational and social network benefits of prosociality in an Andean community.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Evolutionary approaches to cultural and linguistic diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Culture and the evolution of human cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert BoydDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. rboyd@anthro.ucla.edu
Peter J Richerson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of phylogenetic methods to cultural variation raises questions about how cultural adaption works and how it is coupled to cultural transmission. Cultural group selection is of particular interest in this context because it depends on the same kinds of mechanisms that lead to tree-like patterns of cultural variation. Here, we review ideas about cultural group selection relevant to cultural phylogenetics. We discuss why group selection among multiple equilibria is not subject to the usual criticisms directed at group selection, why multiple equilibria are a common phenomena, and why selection among multiple equilibria is not likely to be an important force in genetic evolution. We also discuss three forms of group competition and the processes that cause populations to shift from one equilibrium to another and create a mutation-like process at the group level.

Indexed as

Cultural EvolutionEmigration and ImmigrationEvolution, MolecularHumansModels, TheoreticalPhylogenySocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID21041204
PMCPMC2981912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.