Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21040715›Full record

ArticleBrain research2011

Terminal field specificity of forebrain efferent axons to the pontine parabrachial nucleus and medullary reticular formation.

Chi Zhang, Yi Kang, Robert F Lundy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Direct Parabrachial-Cortical Connectivity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  5. Central taste anatomy and physiology.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor signaling in the lateral parabrachial nucleus contributes to the control of food intake and motivation to feed.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014 · on this map
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chi ZhangDepartment of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Yi Kang
Robert F Lundy
University of Louisville · US

Funding

NEURAL MODULATION OF CENTRAL TASTE PROCESSINGR01DC006698 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI LUNDY, ROBERT F · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
NEURAL MODULATION OF CENTRAL TASTE PROCESSINGR55DC006698 · NIDCD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI LUNDY, ROBERT F · 2005 to 2005
$100k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-006698NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006698NIDCD NIH HHS R55 DC006698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pontine parabrachial nucleus (PBN) and medullary reticular formation (RF) are hindbrain regions that, respectively, process sensory input and coordinate motor output related to ingestive behavior. Neural processing in each hindbrain site is subject to modulation originating from several forebrain structures including the insular gustatory cortex (IC), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), and lateral hypothalamus (LH). The present study combined electrophysiology and retrograde tracing techniques to determine the extent of overlap between neurons within the IC, BNST, CeA and LH that target both the PBN and RF. One fluorescent retrograde tracer, red (RFB) or green (GFB) latex microbeads, was injected into the gustatory PBN under electrophysiological guidance and a different retrograde tracer, GFB or fluorogold (FG), into the ipsilateral RF using the location of gustatory NST as a point of reference. Brain tissue containing each forebrain region was sectioned, scanned using a confocal microscope, and scored for the number of single and double labeled neurons. Neurons innervating the RF only, the PBN only, or both the medullary RF and PBN were observed, largely intermingled, in each forebrain region. The CeA contained the largest number of cells retrogradely labeled after tracer injection into either hindbrain region. For each forebrain area except the IC, the origin of descending input to the RF and PBN was almost entirely ipsilateral. Axons from a small percentage of hindbrain projecting forebrain neurons targeted both the PBN and RF. Target specific and non-specific inputs from a variety of forebrain nuclei to the hindbrain likely reflect functional specialization in the control of ingestive behaviors.

Indexed as

AxonsNeurons, EfferentAmygdalaAnimalsCerebral CortexEfferent PathwaysHypothalamusMaleMedulla OblongataPonsProsencephalonRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReticular FormationSeptal Nuclei

Identifiers

PMID21040715
PMCPMC3053030
OpenAlexW2090410096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.