Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21039463›Full record

ArticleImmunology2011

Rat eosinophils stimulate the expansion of Cryptococcus neoformans-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells with a T-helper 1 profile.

Ana P Garro, Laura S Chiapello, José L Baronetti, Diana T Masih

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eosinophils in solid cancers: sentinels, predictors, and therapeutic allies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Eosinophils as Major Player in Type 2 Inflammation: Autoimmunity and Beyond.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Animal Models ofFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The status of cryptococcosis in Latin America.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Innate Immune Responses toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Article
  13. Eosinophils in Autoimmune Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Eosinophil in Infection.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2016
    Review
  17. Innate host defenses against Cryptococcus neoformans.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The intracellular life of Cryptococcus neoformans.Annual review of pathology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana P GarroCentro de Investigaciones en Bioquímica Clínica e Inmunología (CIBICI), CONICET, Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Medina Allende y Haya de la Torre, Ciudad Universitaria, Córdoba, Argentina.
Laura S Chiapello
José L Baronetti
Diana T Masih
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental Cryptococcus neoformans infection in rats has been shown to have similarities with human cryptococcosis, revealing a strong granulomatous response and a low susceptibility to dissemination. Moreover, it has been shown that eosinophils are components of the inflammatory response to C. neoformans infections. In this in vitro study, we demonstrated that rat peritoneal eosinophils phagocytose opsonized live yeasts of C. neoformans, and that the phenomenon involves the engagement of FcγRII and CD18. Moreover, our results showed that the phagocytosis of opsonized C. neoformans triggers eosinophil activation, as indicated by (i) the up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, MHC class II and costimulatory molecules, and (ii) an increase in interleukin (IL)-12, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production. However, nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H(2) O(2) ) synthesis by eosinophils was down-regulated after interaction with C. neoformans. Furthermore, this work demonstrated that CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes isolated from spleens of infected rats and cultured with C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils proliferate in an MHC class II- and class I-dependent manner, respectively, and produce important amounts of T-helper 1 (Th1) type cytokines, such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, in the absence of T-helper 2 (Th2) cytokine synthesis. In summary, the present study demonstrates that eosinophils act as fungal antigen-presenting cells and suggests that C. neoformans-loaded eosinophils might participate in the adaptive immune response.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansEosinophilsHumansInterferon-gammaMalePhagocytosisRatsRats, WistarTh1 CellsInterferon-gammaTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID21039463
PMCPMC3050441
OpenAlexW1843956515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.