Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21038109›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Evaluating the incidence and utility of microscopic metastatic dissemination as diagnosed by lumbar cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) samples in children with newly diagnosed intracranial ependymoma.

Jason Fangusaro, Clark Van Den Berghe, Tadanori Tomita, Veena Rajaram, Dolly Aguilera, Deli Wang, Stewart Goldman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric metastatic tumors of the posterior fossa at presentation.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jason FangusaroDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Children's Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA. jfangusaro@childrensmemorial.org
Clark Van Den Berghe
Tadanori Tomita
Veena Rajaram
Dolly Aguilera
Deli Wang
Stewart Goldman
Northwestern Memorial Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta · USLurie Children's Hospital · USMemorial Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ependymomas are the third most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor in childhood. After resection, the standard evaluation of intracranial ependymomas includes a post-contrast spine MRI and a lumbar CSF sample to evaluate for metastasis. Although it is estimated that 10-30% of patients will present with metastatic disease, it is unclear what percentage of metastatic disease is solely identified microscopically via lumbar cytology versus that identified as bulky disease on post-contrast spinal MRIs. We retrospectively evaluated all patients at our institution with intracranial ependymoma diagnosed between January 1991 and June 2008 in an effort to evaluate prognostic factors, survival outcomes and incidence of metastatic disease. Sixty-one evaluable patients were identified: 46% were male and the mean age at diagnosis was 64 months (2.04-196.92). The most common tumor location was the posterior fossa (77%) and 64% of patients achieved a gross total resection with initial surgery. Five-year event-free and overall survivals were 39 ± 7% and 87 ± 4%, respectively. Approximately 10% of patients presented with bulky metastatic disease as seen on post-contrast spine MRI. No patient whose spine MRI was negative for tumor had positive lumbar CSF cytology. These data highlight the rarity of patients who present with microscopic metastatic disease noted on lumbar cytology alone and suggest that evaluation of lumbar cytology may not be useful in patients with negative post-contrast spine MRIs. Future prospective trials may be helpful in validating this conclusion before eliminating this procedure as part of the standard evaluation in newly diagnosed ependymoma patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolEpendymomaFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateLumbosacral RegionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21038109
OpenAlexW1989851458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.