Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21038011›Full record

SynthesisPain research & management

A research synthesis of therapeutic interventions for whiplash-associated disorder (WAD): part 5 - surgical and injection-based interventions for chronic WAD.

Robert W Teasell, J Andrew McClure, David Walton, Jason Pretty, Katherine Salter, Matthew Meyer, Keith Sequeira, Barry Death

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pain research & management. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04392999 (A Pilot Study Comparing Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections to Platelet Rich Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04392999 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

A Pilot Study Comparing Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections to Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) as a Treatment for Cervical Facetogenic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2021 to 2024Enrolled55ConditionsCervical PainArmsIntraarticular platelet rich plasma cervical facet injection, Corticosteroid injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient education for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Approach to cervicogenic dizziness: a comprehensive review of its aetiopathology and management.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert W TeasellDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Parkwood Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada. robert.teasell@sjhc.london.on.ca
J Andrew McClure
David Walton
Jason Pretty
Katherine Salter
Matthew Meyer
Keith Sequeira
Barry Death
Lawson Health Research Institute · CASt Joseph's Health Care · CAParkwood Hospital · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) represents a significant public health problem, resulting in substantial social and economic costs throughout the industrialized world. While many treatments have been advocated for patients with WAD, scientific support regarding their effectiveness is often lacking. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the strength of evidence associated with various WAD therapies. Multiple databases (including Web of Science, EMBASE and PubMed) were searched to identify all studies published from January 1980 through March 2009 that evaluated the effectiveness of any well-defined treatment for acute (less than two weeks), subacute (two to 12 weeks) or chronic (more than 12 weeks) WAD. The present article, the fifth in a five-part series, evaluates the evidence for surgical and injection-based interventions initiated during the chronic phase of WAD. Twenty-five studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, six of which were randomized controlled trials with 'good' overall methodological quality (median Physiotherapy Evidence Database score of 7.5). For the treatment of chronic WAD, there was moderate evidence supporting radiofrequency neurotomy as an effective treatment for whiplash-related pain, although relief is not permanent. Sterile water injections have been demonstrated to be superior to saline injections; however, it is not clear whether this treatment is actually beneficial. There was evidence supporting a wide range of other interventions (eg, carpal tunnel decompression) with each of these evaluated by a single nonrandomized controlled trial. There is contradictory evidence regarding the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections, and cervical discectomy and fusion. The evidence is not yet strong enough to establish the effectiveness of any of these treatments; of all the invasive interventions for chronic WAD, radiofrequency neurotomy appears to be supported by the strongest evidence. Further research is required to determine the efficacy and the role of invasive interventions in the treatment of chronic WAD.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesBotulinum Toxins, Type AChronic DiseaseDenervationEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeck PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWhiplash InjuriesAdrenal Cortex HormonesBotulinum Toxins, Type A

Identifiers

PMID21038011
PMCPMC2975535
OpenAlexW87338830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.