Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21037563›Full record

ArticleNature2010

The structural basis for membrane binding and pore formation by lymphocyte perforin.

Ruby H P Law, Natalya Lukoyanova, Ilia Voskoboinik, Tom T Caradoc-Davies, Katherine Baran, Michelle A Dunstone, Michael E D'Angelo, Elena V Orlova, Fasséli Coulibaly, Sandra Verschoor and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 212 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
212citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

212 citing papers in PubMed, 400 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Updates in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN.Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Leveraging T cells for cancer immunotherapy.Immunity & inflammation · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Peripheral Blood CD8International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

152 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruby H P LawDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Natalya Lukoyanova
Ilia Voskoboinik
Tom T Caradoc-Davies
Katherine Baran
Michelle A Dunstone
Michael E D'Angelo
Elena V Orlova
Fasséli Coulibaly
Sandra Verschoor
Kylie A Browne
Annette Ciccone
Michael J Kuiper
Phillip I Bird
Joseph A Trapani
Helen R Saibil
James C Whisstock
Monash University · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Synchrotron · AUBirkbeck, University of London · GBMelbourne Bioinformatics · AU

Funding

Arthritis Research UKBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D008573/1Wellcome Trust 079605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes accomplish the critically important function of killing virus-infected and neoplastic cells. They do this by releasing the pore-forming protein perforin and granzyme proteases from cytoplasmic granules into the cleft formed between the abutting killer and target cell membranes. Perforin, a 67-kilodalton multidomain protein, oligomerizes to form pores that deliver the pro-apoptopic granzymes into the cytosol of the target cell. The importance of perforin is highlighted by the fatal consequences of congenital perforin deficiency, with more than 50 different perforin mutations linked to familial haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (type 2 FHL). Here we elucidate the mechanism of perforin pore formation by determining the X-ray crystal structure of monomeric murine perforin, together with a cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of the entire perforin pore. Perforin is a thin 'key-shaped' molecule, comprising an amino-terminal membrane attack complex perforin-like (MACPF)/cholesterol dependent cytolysin (CDC) domain followed by an epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain that, together with the extreme carboxy-terminal sequence, forms a central shelf-like structure. A C-terminal C2 domain mediates initial, Ca(2+)-dependent membrane binding. Most unexpectedly, however, electron microscopy reveals that the orientation of the perforin MACPF domain in the pore is inside-out relative to the subunit arrangement in CDCs. These data reveal remarkable flexibility in the mechanism of action of the conserved MACPF/CDC fold and provide new insights into how related immune defence molecules such as complement proteins assemble into pores.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneCholesterolCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayEpidermal Growth FactorGranzymesHumansLymphocytesMiceModels, MolecularPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryCholesterolEpidermal Growth FactorGranzymesperforin, mousePore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21037563
OpenAlexW2140813750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.