ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2011
Mechanisms related to NO-induced motility in differentiated rat aortic smooth muscle cells.
Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein tyrosine phosphatases in cell adhesion.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- Topological control of nitric oxide secretion by tantalum oxide nanodot arrays.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2015Article
- Protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B in cell adhesion and migration.Cell adhesion & migrationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is thought to play an important role as an inhibitor of vascular cell proliferation, motility, and neointima formation. This effect is mediated, in part, via the upregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP)1B. Conversely, studies have reported that in presumably hyperinsulinemic mice fed a high-fat diet, NO enhances vascular remodeling, whereas a deficit of NO attenuates vascular remodeling. We have reported that in differentiated cultured smooth muscle cells treated with insulin, NO induces a motogenic effect that is dependent on Src homology-2 domain PTP 2 (SHP2) upregulation. In the present study, we describe novel mechanisms relevant to the motogenic effect of NO. Treatment of cultured cells with the selective angiontensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan, but not with the selective angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonist PD-123319, blocked the comotogenic capacity of NO and insulin. Insulin and NO increased the secretion of ANG II into the culture media by 2- and 2.5-fold (P < 0.05), respectively, whereas treatment of cells with ANG II uncovered the motogenic effect of NO (1.4-fold above control, P < 0.05) and decreased the levels of PTP1B to 45% of control (P < 0.05). Suppression of PTP1B function was sufficient to uncover the motogenic effect of NO. The capacity of insulin to suppress PTP1B activity was blocked by losartan, implicating ANG II function in mediating this effect. Both insulin and ANG II induced the upregulation of phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-δ by two- to threefold (P < 0.05), and this effect was both necessary and sufficient to uncover NO-induced motogenesis. Finally, suppression of PTP1B function potentiated, whereas overexpression of PTP1B inhibited, SHP2-induced motogenesis. These results support the hypothesis that the comotogenic effect of insulin and NO occurs via an ANG II-mediated effect involving the suppression of PTP1B and upregulation of PI3K-δ and SHP2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.