Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21036870›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

The high fidelity and unique error signature of human DNA polymerase epsilon.

Dagmara A Korona, Kimberly G Lecompte, Zachary F Pursell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer version 2024: Updates and discussions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. POLE/POLD1 mutation and tumor immunotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dagmara A KoronaDepartment of Biochemistry and Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Kimberly G Lecompte
Zachary F Pursell
Tulane University · US

Funding

UNCOVERING THE MECHANISMS OF OSTEOSARCOMA METASTASIS SUPPRESSION BY MTBPP20RR020152 · NCRR · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI YOU, ZONGBING · 2004 to 2011
$17.0M
Roles of Human DNA Polymearse Epsilon in Mutagenesis and Genome StabilityR00ES016780 · NIEHS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI PURSELL, ZACHARY F · 2009 to 2011
$746k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020152NCRR NIH HHS RR020152NIEHS NIH HHS 4R00ES016780NIEHS NIH HHS ES016780NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES016780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulk replicative DNA synthesis in eukaryotes is highly accurate and efficient, primarily because of two DNA polymerases (Pols): Pols δ and ε. The high fidelity of these enzymes is due to their intrinsic base selectivity and proofreading exonuclease activity which, when coupled with post-replication mismatch repair, helps to maintain human mutation rates at less than one mutation per genome duplication. Conditions that reduce polymerase fidelity result in increased mutagenesis and can lead to cancer in mice. Whereas yeast Pol ε has been well characterized, human Pol ε remains poorly understood. Here, we present the first report on the fidelity of human Pol ε. We find that human Pol ε carries out DNA synthesis with high fidelity, even in the absence of its 3'→5' exonucleolytic proofreading and is significantly more accurate than yeast Pol ε. Though its spectrum of errors is similar to that of yeast Pol ε, there are several notable exceptions. These include a preference of the human enzyme for T→A over A→T transversions. As compared with other replicative DNA polymerases, human Pol ε is particularly accurate when copying homonucleotide runs of 4-5 bases. The base pair substitution specificity and high fidelity for frameshift errors observed for human Pol ε are distinct from the errors made by human Pol δ.

Indexed as

Base Pair MismatchDNADNA Polymerase IIExodeoxyribonucleasesHumansKineticsMutationPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsDNADNA Polymerase IIExodeoxyribonucleasesPOLE protein, humanPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21036870
PMCPMC3061053
OpenAlexW2133606537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.