Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21036400›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2011

Genetic screening for OPA1 and OPA3 mutations in patients with suspected inherited optic neuropathies.

Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Suma P Shankar, Valérie Biousse, Neil R Miller, Lora J H Bean, Bradford Coffee, Madhuri Hegde, Nancy J Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick Yu-Wai-ManDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Suma P Shankar
Valérie Biousse
Neil R Miller
Lora J H Bean
Bradford Coffee
Madhuri Hegde
Nancy J Newman
Emory University · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOATRIGHT, JEFFREY H · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
OCULAR DISEASE IN GIANT CELL ARTERITISR01EY011916 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEYAND, CORNELIA M. · 1997 to 2011
$2.9M
Medical Research Council G0701386NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NEI NIH HHS P30 EY 06360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011916NEI NIH HHS R01 EY11916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutosomal-dominant optic atrophy (DOA) is one of the most common inherited optic neuropathies, and it is genetically heterogeneous, with mutations in both OPA1 and OPA3 known to cause disease. Approximately 60% of cases harbor OPA1 mutations, whereas OPA3 mutations have been reported in only 2 pedigrees with DOA and premature cataracts. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of OPA1 and OPA3 screening in a cohort of presumed DOA cases referred to a tertiary diagnostic laboratory.

designRetrospective case series.

participantsOne hundred eighty-eight probands with bilateral optic atrophy referred for molecular genetic investigations at a tertiary diagnostic facility: 38 patients with an autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance and 150 sporadic cases.

methodsOPA1 and OPA3 genetic testing was initially performed using polymerase chain reaction-based sequencing methods. The presence of large-scale OPA1 and OPA3 genomic rearrangements was assessed further with a targeted comparative genomic hybridization microarray platform. The 3 primary Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) mutations, m.3460G→>A, m.11778G→A, and m.14484T→C, also were screened in all patients.

main outcome measuresThe proportion of patients with OPA1 and OPA3 pathogenic mutations. The clinical profile observed in molecularly confirmed DOA cases.

resultsTwenty-one different OPA1 mutations were found in 27 (14.4%) of the 188 probands screened. The mutations included 6 novel pathogenic variants and the first reported OPA1 initiation codon mutation at c.1A→T. An OPA1 missense mutation, c.239A→G (p.Y80C), was identified in an 11-year-old black girl with optic atrophy and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy in her lower limbs. The OPA1 detection rate was significantly higher among individuals with a positive family history of visual failure (50.0%) compared with sporadic cases (5.3%). The primary LHON screen was negative in the patient cohort, and additional molecular investigations did not reveal any large-scale OPA1 rearrangements or OPA3 genetic defects. The mean baseline visual acuity for the OPA1-positive group was 0.48 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (units mean Snellen equivalent, 20/61; range, 20/20-20/400; 95% confidence interval, 20/52-20/71), and visual deterioration occurred in 54.2% of patients during follow-up.

conclusionsOPA1 mutations are the most common genetic defects identified in patients with suspected DOA, whereas OPA3 mutations are very rare in isolated optic atrophy cases.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDNA, MitochondrialDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic TestingGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNucleic Acid HybridizationOptic AtrophyDNA, MitochondrialGTP PhosphohydrolasesOPA1 protein, humanOPA3 protein, humanProteins

Identifiers

PMID21036400
PMCPMC3044822
OpenAlexW2144600588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.