Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21036327›Full record

ReviewProgress in molecular biology and translational science2010

Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.

Danielle Renee Reed, Antti Knaapila

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in molecular biology and translational science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 252 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bitter taste receptors as sensors of gut luminal contents.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  14. Developing and regenerating a sense of taste.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Growing Complexity of Human Bitter Taste Perception.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Review
  20. Worldwide study of the taste of bitter medicines and their modifiers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle Renee ReedMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Antti Knaapila
Monell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

GENETICS OF BITTER TASTE PERCEPTION IN HUMANSR01DC004698 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2000 to 2002
$515k
GENETIC LINKAGE STUDIES OF BITTER TASTE PERCEPTIONR03DC003509 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 1997 to 1999
–
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004698NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC003509NIDDK NIH HHS DK56797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating is dangerous. While food contains nutrients and calories that animals need to produce heat and energy, it may also contain harmful parasites, bacteria, or chemicals. To guide food selection, the senses of taste and smell have evolved to alert us to the bitter taste of poisons and the sour taste and off-putting smell of spoiled foods. These sensory systems help people and animals to eat defensively, and they provide the brake that helps them avoid ingesting foods that are harmful. But choices about which foods to eat are motivated by more than avoiding the bad; they are also motivated by seeking the good, such as fat and sugar. However, just as not everyone is equally capable of sensing toxins in food, not everyone is equally enthusiastic about consuming high-fat, high-sugar foods. Genetic studies in humans and experimental animals strongly suggest that the liking of sugar and fat is influenced by genotype; likewise, the abilities to detect bitterness and the malodors of rotting food are highly variable among individuals. Understanding the exact genes and genetic differences that affect food intake may provide important clues in obesity treatment by allowing caregivers to tailor dietary recommendations to the chemosensory landscape of each person.

Indexed as

PleasureAnimalsCalciumFeeding BehaviorHumansPoisonsSmellTasteCalciumPoisons

Identifiers

PMID21036327
PMCPMC3342754
OpenAlexW34946024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.