Ocular pathogens for the twenty-first century.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ocular Tuberculosis--A Clinical Conundrum.Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2016
   Article
2. Polymerase chain reaction to search for Herpes viruses in uveitic and healthy eyes: a South African perspective.African health sciences · 2015
   Article
3. Factors influencing polymerase chain reaction outcomes in patients with clinically suspected ocular tuberculosis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2014
   Article
4. Pediatric uveitis: new and future treatments.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2013
   Review
5. Searching for viral antibodies and genome in intraocular fluids of patients with Fuchs uveitis and non-infectious uveitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Identification of new pathogens in the intraocular fluid of patients with uveitis.2010

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as