Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21035878›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2010

Neuroprotection for traumatic brain injury: translational challenges and emerging therapeutic strategies.

David J Loane, Alan I Faden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 329 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
329citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

329 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preclinical Studies on Mechanisms Underlying the Protective Effects of Propranolol in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of aBioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Benzoate Drugs for Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical & experimental immunology · 2026
    Article

269 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David J LoaneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Center for Shock, Trauma and Anesthesiology Research (STAR), National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alan I Faden

Funding

MODULATION OF INJURY BY METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTORSR01NS037313 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FADEN, ALAN IRA · 1999 to 2019
$5.8M
Role of Cell Cycle Pathways in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)R01NS052568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FADEN, ALAN IRA · 2006 to 2016
$3.8M
Mechanisms and Modulation of Cell Death in Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS061839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FADEN, ALAN IRA · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
Combination drug treatment to inhibit multiple cell death pathways after TBIRC1HD064758 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FADEN, ALAN IRA · 2009 to 2010
$971k
NICHD NIH HHS RC1 HD064758NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037313NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052568NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes secondary biochemical changes that contribute to subsequent tissue damage and associated neuronal cell death. Neuroprotective treatments that limit secondary tissue loss and/or improve behavioral outcome have been well established in multiple animal models of TBI. However, translation of such neuroprotective strategies to human injury have been disappointing, with the failure of more than thirty controlled clinical trials. Both conceptual issues and methodological differences between preclinical and clinical injury have undoubtedly contributed to these translational difficulties. More recently, changes in experimental approach, as well as altered clinical trial methodologies, have raised cautious optimism regarding the outcomes of future clinical trials. Here we critically review developing experimental neuroprotective strategies that show promise, and we propose criteria for improving the probability of successful clinical translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrugs, InvestigationalHumansNerve DegenerationNeuroprotective AgentsTranslational Research, BiomedicalDrugs, InvestigationalNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID21035878
PMCPMC2999630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.