ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2010
Predicting direct protein interactions from affinity purification mass spectrometry data.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteome-wide assessment of human interactome as a source of capturing domain-motif and domain-domain interactions.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2024Article
- Structural coverage of the human interactome.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- How different viruses perturb host cellular machinery via short linear motifs.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- The Landscape of Virus-Host Protein-Protein Interaction Databases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Identification and characterization of the BRI2 interactome in the brain.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A two-step framework for inferring direct protein-protein interaction network from AP-MS data.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- A computational framework for distinguishing direct versus indirect interactions in human functional protein-protein interaction networks.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2017Article
- Identifying binary protein-protein interactions from affinity purification mass spectrometry data.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Towards a Hierarchical Strategy to Explore Multi-Scale IP/MS Data for Protein Complexes.PloS one · 2015Article
- Scoring docking conformations using predicted protein interfaces.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Inferring protein-protein interaction complexes from immunoprecipitation data.BMC research notes · 2013Article
- Exploiting conformational ensembles in modeling protein-protein interactions on the proteome scale.Journal of proteome research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAffinity purification followed by mass spectrometry identification (AP-MS) is an increasingly popular approach to observe protein-protein interactions (PPI) in vivo. One drawback of AP-MS, however, is that it is prone to detecting indirect interactions mixed with direct physical interactions. Therefore, the ability to distinguish direct interactions from indirect ones is of much interest.
resultsWe first propose a simple probabilistic model for the interactions captured by AP-MS experiments, under which the problem of separating direct interactions from indirect ones is formulated. Then, given idealized quantitative AP-MS data, we study the problem of identifying the most likely set of direct interactions that produced the observed data. We address this challenging graph theoretical problem by first characterizing signatures that can identify weakly connected nodes as well as dense regions of the network. The rest of the direct PPI network is then inferred using a genetic algorithm.Our algorithm shows good performance on both simulated and biological networks with very high sensitivity and specificity. Then the algorithm is used to predict direct interactions from a set of AP-MS PPI data from yeast, and its performance is measured against a high-quality interaction dataset.
conclusionsAs the sensitivity of AP-MS pipeline improves, the fraction of indirect interactions detected will also increase, thereby making the ability to distinguish them even more desirable. Despite the simplicity of our model for indirect interactions, our method provides a good performance on the test networks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.