Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21034426›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Efficient motif finding algorithms for large-alphabet inputs.

Pavel P Kuksa, Vladimir Pavlovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review on Planted (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PMS6: A Fast Algorithm for Motif Discovery.IEEE ... International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review of Different Sequence Motif Finding Algorithms.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavel P KuksaDepartment of Computer Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. pkuksa@cs.rutgers.edu
Vladimir Pavlovic

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe consider the problem of identifying motifs, recurring or conserved patterns, in the biological sequence data sets. To solve this task, we present a new deterministic algorithm for finding patterns that are embedded as exact or inexact instances in all or most of the input strings.

resultsThe proposed algorithm (1) improves search efficiency compared to existing algorithms, and (2) scales well with the size of alphabet. On a synthetic planted DNA motif finding problem our algorithm is over 10× more efficient than MITRA, PMSPrune, and RISOTTO for long motifs. Improvements are orders of magnitude higher in the same setting with large alphabets. On benchmark TF-binding site problems (FNP, CRP, LexA) we observed reduction in running time of over 12×, with high detection accuracy. The algorithm was also successful in rapidly identifying protein motifs in Lipocalin, Zinc metallopeptidase, and supersecondary structure motifs for Cadherin and Immunoglobin families.

conclusionsOur algorithm reduces computational complexity of the current motif finding algorithms and demonstrate strong running time improvements over existing exact algorithms, especially in important and difficult cases of large-alphabet sequences.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesAmino Acid MotifsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNANucleic Acid ConformationPattern Recognition, AutomatedProtein ConformationSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareTranscription FactorsDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21034426
PMCPMC2966288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.