ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2010
Nonparametric tests for right-censored data with biased sampling.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saddlepoint approximations for linear rank tests with left-truncated, right-censored, and cross-sectional data under randomized block design.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises tests for the k-sample problem with left-truncated and right-censored data.Lifetime data analysis · 2026Article
- Survival Modelling For Data From Combined Cohorts: Opening the Door to Meta Survival Analyses and Survival Analysis using Electronic Health Records.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2023Article
- A nonparametric test for equality of survival medians using right-censored prevalent cohort survival data.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Article
- Challenges of Integrative Disease Modeling in Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Review
- A nonparametric maximum likelihood approach for survival data with observed cured subjects, left truncation and right-censoring.Lifetime data analysis · 2018Article
- Sample size calculations for prevalent cohort designs.Statistical methods in medical research · 2017Article
- Nonparametric and semiparametric regression estimation for length-biased survival data.Lifetime data analysis · 2017Review
- Rank-based testing of equal survivorship based on cross-sectional survival data with or without prospective follow-up.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Score Estimating Equations from Embedded Likelihood Functions under Accelerated Failure Time Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2014Article
- Article
- Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for length-biased data.Statistics in medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Testing the equality of two survival distributions can be difficult in a prevalent cohort study when non random sampling of subjects is involved. Due to the biased sampling scheme, independent censoring assumption is often violated. Although the issues about biased inference caused by length-biased sampling have been widely recognized in statistical, epidemiological and economical literature, there is no satisfactory solution for efficient two-sample testing. We propose an asymptotic most efficient nonparametric test by properly adjusting for length-biased sampling. The test statistic is derived from a full likelihood function, and can be generalized from the two-sample test to a k-sample test. The asymptotic properties of the test statistic under the null hypothesis are derived using its asymptotic independent and identically distributed representation. We conduct extensive Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed test statistics and compare them with the conditional test and the standard logrank test for different biased sampling schemes and right-censoring mechanisms. For length-biased data, empirical studies demonstrated that the proposed test is substantially more powerful than the existing methods. For general left-truncated data, the proposed test is robust, still maintains accurate control of type I error rate, and is also more powerful than the existing methods, if the truncation patterns and right-censoring patterns are the same between the groups. We illustrate the methods using two real data examples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.