Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21031021›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2010

Molecular analysis of cataract families in India: new mutations in the CRYBB2 and GJA3 genes and rare polymorphisms.

Sathiyavedu T Santhiya, Ganesan Senthil Kumar, Pridhvi Sudhakar, Navnit Gupta, Norman Klopp, Thomas Illig, Torben Söker, Marco Groth, Matthias Platzer, Puthiya M Gopinath and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human Crystallin Variation and Cataract.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A NovelJournal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Article
  16. A novel mutation of p.F32I inInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Article
  17. The E368Q Mutant Allele ofOpen access journal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sathiyavedu T SanthiyaDr. ALM Postgraduate Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Genetics, University of Madras, Taramani, Chennai, India.
Ganesan Senthil Kumar
Pridhvi Sudhakar
Navnit Gupta
Norman Klopp
Thomas Illig
Torben Söker
Marco Groth
Matthias Platzer
Puthiya M Gopinath
Jochen Graw
University of Madras · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to resolve the genetic etiology in families having inherited cataracts.

methodsFamilies afflicted with congenital/childhood cataracts were registered in Chennai and Orissa (India). Blood samples were collected from the probands and available family members. Selected functional candidate genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and characterized by direct sequencing. Putative mutations were confirmed in healthy controls.

resultsWe observed interesting new polymorphisms of ethnic specificity, some of frequent nature, such as a 3-bp deletion in intron 3 of CRYBB2 (encoding βB2-crystallin) and IVS1+9 c>t variation in HSF4 (encoding heat-shock factor 4). Some rare single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) co-segregate with the respective phenotype such as IVS3+120c>a of CRYBB2, while M44V of CRYGD (encoding γD-crystallin), although found in association with blue dot opacity was seen in a few healthy controls too. We identified two new mutations co-segregating along with the respective cataract phenotype within the families that were not seen in healthy controls from India or Germany. These include two missense mutations; one in GJA3 (encoding gap junction protein α3, which is also referred to as connexin 46); the mutation affects codon 19 (T19M), and the corresponding phenotype is a posterior-polar cataract. The other missense mutation affects CRYBB2 (W59C; total cataract). Additionally, a cDNA variation (G54A) identified in a zonular cataract affects a highly conserved splice site of CRYBB2. This mutation, however, showed reduced penetrance in the family, which might be explained by different molecular consequences in the affected family members: nonsense-mediated decay of the mutated mRNA might have no clinical phenotype in heterozygotes, whereas the translation of the mutated mRNA is predicted to lead to a small hybrid protein (consisting of 16 amino acids of the βB2-crystallin and 18 new amino-acids), which might have a dominant-negative function in the lens.

conclusionsThis report identifies in families with childhood cataract some new alleles, which may be considered as causative for cataracts. Furthermore, we report some geographically restricted rare polymorphic sites, whose significance might be considered in some context as modifiers or alleles in sensitizing ocular lens toward cataractogenesis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmino Acid SequenceBase Sequencebeta-Crystallin B ChainCataractChildChild, PreschoolConnexinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Mutational AnalysisFamilyFatal OutcomeFemalegamma-CrystallinsHeat Shock Transcription Factorsbeta-crystallin B2beta-Crystallin B ChainConnexinsCRYGD protein, humanDNA-Binding Proteinsgamma-CrystallinsGJA3 protein, humanHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHSF4 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21031021
PMCPMC2956670
OpenAlexW1847168634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.