ArticleSpine2010
Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective.
Article in Spine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Integrating the Patient Voice Into Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Communication Strategies in the Management of Chronic Pain
Trigger Point Injection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Low Back (T-PIMPS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Global prevalence of hospital admissions for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence of low back pain in emergency settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Pooled it
- 2016 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review.JAMA internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- PURLs: More isn't better with acute low back pain treatment.The Journal of family practice · 2016Guideline
- Herbal medicine for low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Participant experiences receiving acupuncture for acute musculoskeletal pain in an emergency department: A qualitative evaluation.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Diclofenac + Ibuprofen for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study.Annals of emergency medicine · 2024Trial
- A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pain Treatment Communication Tools in Emergency Department Patients With Back or Kidney Stone Pain.American journal of public health · 2022Trial
- A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ibuprofen Plus Metaxalone, Tizanidine, or Baclofen for Acute Low Back Pain.Annals of emergency medicine · 2019Trial
- Trial
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Naproxen With or Without Orphenadrine or Methocarbamol for Acute Low Back Pain.Annals of emergency medicine · 2018Trial
- Diazepam Is No Better Than Placebo When Added to Naproxen for Acute Low Back Pain.Annals of emergency medicine · 2017Trial
- Electrical stimulation for chronic non-specific low back pain in a working-age population: a 12-week double blinded randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2013Trial
- Intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac for acute low back pain in the emergency department: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Initiating Care for Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department of the Veterans Health Administration, Impact on the Location of Subsequent Visits.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Pathology Testing for Patients With Low Back Pain in Australian Emergency Departments.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Analysis of National Institutes of Health funding for back pain research in the United States.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Usual Care for Low Back Pain at United States Emergency Departments, 2016-2022.Annals of emergency medicine · 2025Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designThis study is an analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), a large sample representative of all emergency department (ED) visits throughout the United States.
objectiveTo use NHAMCS to describe the frequency of ED visits for the treatment of low back pain, and the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies employed by emergency clinicians. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is common in the general population. While it accounts for 2.5% of all outpatient office visits, the role of the ED has yet to be described.
methodsWe included cases if they had both a reason for visit related to back pain and a primary ED discharge ICD9 code consistent with low back pain. The outcomes included frequency of ED use, and frequency of various diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Individual patient visits are weighted so that data can be extrapolated to all ED visits throughout the United States.
resultsLow back pain related disorders caused 2.63 million (95% CI: 2.32, 2.93 million) annual ED visits in the US. Of all patients with low back pain, 30.5% (28.1, 32.9) had a plain radiograph; 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2, 12.6) had a CT or MRI in 2006 compared with 3.2% (95% CI: 2.0, 5.1) in 2002 (P for trend <0.01). Age and type of insurance were associated with advanced imaging, though geographic region was not. Of medications either administered in the ED or prescribed at discharge, the most frequently used classes were opioids (61.0%, 95% CI: 58.4, 63.5), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (49.9%, 95% CI: 47.2, 52.7) and muscle relaxants (43.1%, 95% CI: 40.4, 45.8).
conclusionLow back pain related disorders are a frequent cause of ED visit. Diagnostic imaging is performed in one-third of all patients. There was a strong secular trend in use of advanced imaging; patients were nearly 3 times as likely to receive a CT or MRI in 2006 as they were 4 years earlier. Although opioids were administered or prescribed to two-thirds of patients, use of therapeutic agents was generally in keeping with guideline recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.