Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21030585›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing affects trafficking of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor.

Chammiran Daniel, Helene Wahlstedt, Johan Ohlson, Petra Björk, Marie Ohman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evolution of Engineered ADAR-Based RNA Editing Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Region and layer-specific expression of GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Experimental evidence for the functional importance and adaptive advantage of A-to-I RNA editing in fungi.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Loss of CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. GABAIUPHAR/BPS guide to pharmacology CITE · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A porcine brain-wide RNA editing landscape.Communications biology · 2021
    Article
  19. RNA processing in neurological tissue: development, aging and disease.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chammiran DanielDepartment of Molecular Biology and Functional Genomics, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Helene Wahlstedt
Johan Ohlson
Petra Björk
Marie Ohman
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recoding by adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing plays an important role in diversifying proteins involved in neurotransmission. We have previously shown that the Gabra-3 transcript, coding for the α3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor is edited in mouse, causing an isoleucine to methionine (I/M) change. Here we show that this editing event is evolutionarily conserved from human to chicken. Analyzing recombinant GABA(A) receptor subunits expressed in HEK293 cells, our results suggest that editing at the I/M site in α3 has functional consequences on receptor expression. We demonstrate that I/M editing reduces the cell surface and the total number of α3 subunits. The reduction in cell surface levels is independent of the subunit combination as it is observed for α3 in combination with either the β2 or the β3 subunit. Further, an amino acid substitution at the corresponding I/M site in the α1 subunit has a similar effect on cell surface presentation, indicating the importance of this site for receptor trafficking. We show that the I/M editing during brain development is inversely related to the α3 protein abundance. Our results suggest that editing controls trafficking of α3-containing receptors and may therefore facilitate the switch of subunit compositions during development as well as the subcellular distribution of α subunits in the adult brain.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAdenosineAdultAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBrainHEK293 CellsHumansInosineMiceProtein TransportRatsReceptors, GABA-ARecombinant ProteinsRNA EditingAdenosineGABRA3 protein, humanGabra3 protein, mouseGabra3 protein, ratGABRB3 protein, humanGabrb3 protein, mouseGabrb3 protein, ratInosineReceptors, GABA-ARecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21030585
PMCPMC3023500
OpenAlexW1855150869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.