ArticleBMC gastroenterology2010
Laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: an evaluation of cellular immunity.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery beneficial for elderly patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015Pooled it
- The perioperative dynamics of IL-7 following robot-assisted and open colorectal surgery.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Impacts on Natural Killer Cells.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- Serum Selenium Concentration as a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Influence of Laparoscopic Surgery on Cellular Immunity in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic Radical Resection versus Routine Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Anesthesia Techniques and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Comparison of a Five-Year Survival and Cancer Recurrence between Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colonic Resections due to Adenocarcinoma-a Single Centre Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.Surgery today · 2018Article
- Perioperative Increase in Neutrophil CD64 Expression is an Indicator for Intra-abdominal Infection after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Radiology and oncology · 2017Article
- A model for lymphocyte activation in open versus laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
- Clinical comparison of laparoscopy vs open surgery in a radical operation for rectal cancer: A retrospective case-control study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery provides better short-term clinical and inflammatory outcomes compared to open colorectal surgery.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
- Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2015Article
- Survival after laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer: a comparative, single-institution study.BMC surgery · 2015Article
- Efficacy of laparoscopic resection in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.Surgery today · 2014Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: state of art.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Minimally Invasive Colorectal Resection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Technical Tips, Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.International scholarly research notices · 2014Article
- Prognostic significance of complications after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is one kind of frequent malignant tumors of the digestive tract which gets high morbidity and mortality allover the world. Despite the promising clinical results recently, less information is available regarding the perioperative immunological effects of laparoscopic surgery when compared with the open surgery. This study aimed to compare the cellular immune responses of patients who underwent laparoscopic (LCR) and open resections (OCR) for colorectal cancer.
methodsBetween Mar 2009 and Sep 2009, 35 patients with colorectal carcinoma underwent LCR by laparoscopic surgeon. These patients were compared with 33 cases underwent conventional OCR by colorectal surgeon. Clinical data about the patients were collected prospectively. Comparison of the operative details and postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection was performed. Peripheral venous blood samples from these 68 patients were taken prior to surgery as well as on postoperative days (POD) 1, 4 and 7. Cell counts of total white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocyte subpopulations, natural killer (NK) cells as well as CRP were determined by blood counting instrument, flow cytometry and hematology analyzer.
resultsThere was no difference in the age, gender and tumor status between the two groups. The operating time was a little longer in the laparoscopic group (P > 0.05), but the blood loss was less (P = 0.039). Patients with laparoscopic resection had earlier return of bowel function and earlier resumption of diet as well as shorter median hospital stay (P < 0.001). Compared with OCR group, cell numbers of total lymphocytes, CD4+T cells and CD8+T cells were significant more in LCR group (P < 0.05) on POD 4, while there was no difference in the CD45RO+T or NK cell numbers between the two groups. Cellular immune responds were similar between the two groups on POD1 and POD7.
conclusionsLaparoscopic colorectal resection gets less surgery stress and short-term advantages compared with open resection. Cellular immune respond appears to be less affected by laparoscopic colorectal resection when compared with open resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.