ReviewMolecular plant pathology2010
Natural variation in priming of basal resistance: from evolutionary origin to agricultural exploitation.
Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant defence priming and memory mechanisms under climate change.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- The effect of foliar chitosan application on fusarium head blight in barley is highly genotype dependent.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Bivalent Histone Modifications Orchestrate Temporal Regulation of Glucosinolate Biosynthesis During Wound-Induced Stress Responses in Arabidopsis.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Multifaceted Impacts of Plant-BeneficialACS omega · 2023Review
- Insights to Gossypium defense response against Verticillium dahliae: the Cotton Cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Decrypting the multi-functional biological activators and inducers of defense responses against biotic stresses in plants.Heliyon · 2023Review
- A single amino acid transporter controls the uptake of priming-inducing beta-amino acids and the associated tradeoff between induced resistance and plant growth.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- 'Priming' protectsFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- The IBI1 Receptor of β-Aminobutyric Acid Interacts with VOZ Transcription Factors to Regulate Abscisic Acid Signaling and Callose-Associated Defense.Molecular plant · 2020Article
- Methyl Salicylate Glucosylation Regulates Plant Defense Signaling and Systemic Acquired Resistance.Plant physiology · 2019Article
- The Role of Heavy Metals in Plant Response to Biotic Stress.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Metabolomics in Plant Priming Research: The Way Forward?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Proteomic Analysis of Aphid-Resistant and -Sensitive Rose (Proteomes · 2018Article
- Can Plant Defence Mechanisms Provide New Approaches for the Sustainable Control of the Two-Spotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- The interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria synergistically enhance host plant defences against pathogens.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- The role of DNA (de)methylation in immune responsiveness of Arabidopsis.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2016Article
- CaLecRK-S.5, a pepper L-type lectin receptor kinase gene, confers broad-spectrum resistance by activating priming.Journal of experimental botany · 2016Article
- Differential phenotypic and genetic expression of defence compounds in a plant-herbivore interaction along elevation.Royal Society open science · 2016Article
- Rice OsVAMP714, a membrane-trafficking protein localized to the chloroplast and vacuolar membrane, is involved in resistance to rice blast disease.Plant molecular biology · 2016Article
- Transcriptome analysis highlights preformed defences and signalling pathways controlled by the prAe1 quantitative trait locus (QTL), conferring partial resistance to Aphanomyces euteiches in Medicago truncatula.Molecular plant pathology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biotic stress has a major impact on the process of natural selection in plants. As plants have evolved under variable environmental conditions, they have acquired a diverse spectrum of defensive strategies against pathogens and herbivores. Genetic variation in the expression of plant defence offers valuable insights into the evolution of these strategies. The 'zigzag' model, which describes an ongoing arms race between inducible plant defences and their suppression by pathogens, is now a commonly accepted model of plant defence evolution. This review explores additional strategies by which plants have evolved to cope with biotic stress under different selective circumstances. Apart from interactions with plant-beneficial micro-organisms that can antagonize pathogens directly, plants have the ability to prime their immune system in response to selected environmental signals. This defence priming offers disease protection that is effective against a broad spectrum of virulent pathogens, as long as the augmented defence reaction is expressed before the invading pathogen has the opportunity to suppress host defences. Furthermore, priming has been shown to be a cost-efficient defence strategy under relatively hostile environmental conditions. Accordingly, it is possible that selected plant varieties have evolved a constitutively primed immune system to adapt to levels of disease pressure. Here, we examine this hypothesis further by evaluating the evidence for natural variation in the responsiveness of basal defence mechanisms, and discuss how this genetic variation can be exploited in breeding programmes to provide sustainable crop protection against pests and diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.