Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21029280›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2011

The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.

Sally Nathan, Lynda Johnston, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  11. Aiming for inclusion: a case study of motivations for involvement in mental health-care governance by ethnic minority users.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient involvement in research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sally NathanSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. s.nathan@unsw.edu.au
Lynda Johnston
Jeffrey Braithwaite

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This paper examines staff views about legitimacy of different roles for community representatives sitting on health service committees as part of a formal Community Participation Program (CPP) in an Area Health Service (AHS) in Australia. DESIGN A cross-sectional survey using a self-completed questionnaire by staff on committees with community representation in the AHS in 2008. SETTING The study site has a population of approximately 1.4 million and covers 6000 km(2) . The population is ethnically and socio-economically diverse. RESULTS There are generally positive staff attitudes at this AHS for community participation as part of the CPP with positive impacts identified, including on service delivery and the conduct of health service meetings. Most saw community representatives having legitimate roles in representing the community, improving communication between the health service and the community and providing constructive feedback. However, staff expectations about the community's role on committees do not match the reality they say they observe and less than half the staff thought the community and health service agree on the role of community representatives. CONCLUSIONS As well as reviewing and enhancing training and support for representatives and staff as part of the CPP, there is a need to question staff expectations about community members who sit on health service committees and whether these expectations are shared by other key stakeholders, most notably the community representatives themselves. These expectations have implications for the CPP and for similar programs designed to engage community members on committees and working groups with health professionals.

Indexed as

Health Services AdministrationAdvisory CommitteesAttitude to HealthAustraliaCommittee MembershipCommunicationCommunity ParticipationCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionHumansNew South WalesRole

Identifiers

PMID21029280
PMCPMC5060580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.