Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21029279›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2011

Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.

Phil Cotterell, Gwen Harlow, Carolyn Morris, Peter Beresford, Bec Hanley, Anita Sargeant, John Sitzia, Kristina Staley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Involvement: lessons from experience - a personal journey.Research involvement and engagement · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Patient and public involvement facilitators: Could they be the key to the NHS quality improvement agenda?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A critical analysis of the implementation of service user involvement in primary care research and health service development using normalization process theory.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Phil CotterellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Gwen Harlow
Carolyn Morris
Peter Beresford
Bec Hanley
Anita Sargeant
John Sitzia
Kristina Staley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundService user involvement is embedded in the United Kingdom's National Health Service, but knowledge about the impact of involvement on service users, such as the benefits and challenges of involvement, is scant. Our research addresses this gap.

objectiveTo explore the personal impact of involvement on the lives of service users affected by cancer.

designWe conducted eight focus groups with user groups supplemented by nine face-to-face interviews with involved individuals active at a local, regional and national level. Thematic analysis was conducted both independently and collectively. SETTING AND

participantsSixty-four participants, engaged in involvement activities in cancer services, palliative care and research, were recruited across Great Britain.

resultsWe identified three main themes: (i) 'Expectations and motivations for involvement'- the desire to improve services and the need for user groups to have a clear purpose, (ii) 'Positive aspects of involvement'- support provided by user groups and assistance to live well with cancer and (iii) 'Challenging aspects of involvement'- insensitivities and undervaluing of involvement by staff.

conclusionsThis study identified that involvement has the capacity to produce varied and significant personal impacts for involved people. Involvement can be planned and implemented in ways that increase these impacts and that mediates challenges for those involved. Key aspects to increase positive impact for service users include the value service providers attach to involvement activities, the centrality with which involvement is embedded in providers' activities, and the capacity of involvement to influence policy, planning, service delivery, research and/or practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient CareResearchSocial SupportState MedicineSurvivorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21029279
PMCPMC5060569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.