Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21029277›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2011

Questioning context: a set of interdisciplinary questions for investigating contextual factors affecting health decision making.

Andrea Charise, Holly Witteman, Sarah Whyte, Erica J Sutton, Jacqueline L Bender, Michael Massimi, Lindsay Stephens, Joshua Evans, Carmen Logie, Raza M Mirza and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Philosophy, health services and research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea ChariseHealth Care, Technology and Place CIHR Strategic Training Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. andrea.charise@utoronto.ca
Holly Witteman
Sarah Whyte
Erica J Sutton
Jacqueline L Bender
Michael Massimi
Lindsay Stephens
Joshua Evans
Carmen Logie
Raza M Mirza
Marie Elf

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo combine insights from multiple disciplines into a set of questions that can be used to investigate contextual factors affecting health decision making.

backgroundDecision-making processes and outcomes may be shaped by a range of non-medical or 'contextual' factors particular to an individual including social, economic, political, geographical and institutional conditions. Research concerning contextual factors occurs across many disciplines and theoretical domains, but few conceptual tools have attempted to integrate and translate this wide-ranging research for health decision-making purposes.

methodsTo formulate this tool we employed an iterative, collaborative process of scenario development and question generation. Five hypothetical health decision-making scenarios (preventative, screening, curative, supportive and palliative) were developed and used to generate a set of exploratory questions that aim to highlight potential contextual factors across a range of health decisions.

findingsWe present an exploratory tool consisting of questions organized into four thematic domains - Bodies, Technologies, Place and Work (BTPW) - articulating wide-ranging contextual factors relevant to health decision making. The BTPW tool encompasses health-related scholarship and research from a range of disciplines pertinent to health decision making, and identifies concrete points of intersection between its four thematic domains. Examples of the practical application of the questions are also provided.

conclusionsThese exploratory questions provide an interdisciplinary toolkit for identifying the complex contextual factors affecting decision making. The set of questions comprised by the BTPW tool may be applied wholly or partially in the context of clinical practice, policy development and health-related research.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCanadaCooperative BehaviorHealth PromotionHealth Services ResearchHumansInternetSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21029277
PMCPMC5060568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.