Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21029086›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2010

Effects of competition on the cost and quality of inpatient rehabilitation care under prospective payment.

Carrie Hoverman Colla, José J Escarce, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin, Neeraj Sood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Competition and quality in a physiotherapy market with fixed prices.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
  8. Payment reform. Introduction.Health services research · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie Hoverman CollaDartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03766, USA. carrie.colla@dartmouth.edu
José J Escarce
Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin
Neeraj Sood
Dartmouth College · USRAND Corporation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Competition Among Post Acute Care ProvidersR01HS018541 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI SOOD, NEERAJ · 2009 to 2011
$1.5M
Post-Acute Costs and Outcomes After Medicare's Reimbursement ChangesR01AG031260 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI SOOD, NEERAJ · 2008 to 2010
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS018541AHRQ HHS R01HS018541NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031260NIA NIH HHS R01AG031260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of competition in postacute care (PAC) markets on resource intensity and outcomes of care in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) after prospective payment was implemented. DATA SOURCES: Medicare claims, Provider of Services file, Enrollment file, Area Resource file, Minimum Data Set. STUDY

designWe created an exogenous measure of competition based on patient travel distances and used instrumental variables models to estimate the effect of competition on inpatient rehabilitation costs, length of stay, and death or institutionalization. DATA EXTRACTION

methodsA file was constructed linking data for Medicare patients discharged from acute care between 2002 and 2003 and admitted to an IRF with a diagnosis of hip fracture or stroke. PRINCIPAL

findingsCompetition had different effects on treatment intensity and outcomes for hip fracture and stroke patients. In the treatment of hip fracture, competition increased costs and length of stay, while increasing rates of death or institutionalization. In the treatment of stroke, competition decreased costs and length of stay and produced inferior outcomes.

conclusionsThe effects of competition in PAC markets may vary by condition. It is important to study the effects of competition by diagnostic condition and to study the effects across populations that vary in severity. Our finding that higher competition under prospective payment led to worse IRF outcomes raises concerns and calls for additional research.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsEconomic CompetitionFemaleHip FracturesHospital AdministrationHospital ChargesHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMedicarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective Payment System

Identifiers

PMID21029086
PMCPMC3029852
OpenAlexW2110722126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.