Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20981464›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2011

Identification of clinically relevant viridans group streptococci by phenotypic and genotypic analysis.

C Teles, A Smith, G Ramage, S Lang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Insights into the role ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Clinical View onFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and other Mitis streptococci: importance of molecular methods.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  11. An Overview onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Development of a reference data set for assigningAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C TelesDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
A Smith
G Ramage
S Lang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two phenotypic and three molecular methods were assessed for their ability to identify viridans group streptococci (VGS) to the species level. A panel of 23 clinical isolates, comprising strains isolated from infective endocarditis, blood cultures, pleural and peritoneal fluid, and 19 type/reference strains were analyzed. Identification was performed using two conventional phenotypic methods: API® rapid ID 32 Strep and the VITEK® 2 system, and genotypic analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the housekeeping gene sodA, restriction patterns generated by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the 16S rRNA gene and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of seven housekeeping genes. The API® rapid ID 32 Strep accurately speciated 79% of the strains assessed, while the VITEK® 2 generated a successful identification for 55%, presenting limitations particularly with regard to species belonging to the mitis group. RFLP of the 16S rRNA gene correctly speciated 24% of the strains, having failed to allocate a species for 36% of the isolates examined. In contrast, sequence analysis of the sodA gene provided a correct identification for 95% of the strains assessed, while identification using the MLSA technique was unsuccessful due to practical limitations. The results generated herein indicate that no single methodology can be used to provide an accurate identification to the species level of all VGS, although nucleotide sequence analysis of the sodA gene proved to be useful in providing reliable speciation.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesHumansMolecular TypingMultilocus Sequence TypingPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificityStreptococcal InfectionsViridans StreptococciRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.