Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20981294›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2011

Animal models of typical heterotopic ossification.

Lixin Kan, John A Kessler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Methods for the reliable induction of heterotopic ossification in the conditionalJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Crosstalk between substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide during heterotopic ossification in murine Achilles tendon.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lixin KanDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg Medical School, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. l-kan@northwestern.edu
John A Kessler

Funding

REGULATION OF NEUROTRANSMITTER METABOLISMR01NS020778 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI KESSLER, JOHN A · 1985 to 2014
$4.6M
MECHANISMS GOVERNING NEURONAL DEVELOPMENTR01NS020013 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI KESSLER, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020013NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020778PHS HHS R01 020013-25PHS HHS R01 020778-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of marrow-containing bone outside of the normal skeleton. Acquired HO following traumatic events is a common and costly clinical complication. In contrast, hereditary HO is rarer, progressive, and life-threatening. Substantial effort has been directed towards understanding the mechanisms underlying HO and finding efficient treatments. However, one crucial limiting factor has been the lack of relevant animal models. This article reviews the major currently available animal models, summarizes some of the insights gained from these studies, and discusses the potential future challenges and directions in HO research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsGenetic Diseases, InbornOssification, Heterotopic

Identifiers

PMID20981294
PMCPMC2963134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.