Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20981028›Full record

ArticleNature communications2010

Protein-binding assays in biological liquids using microscale thermophoresis.

Christoph J Wienken, Philipp Baaske, Ulrich Rothbauer, Dieter Braun, Stefan Duhr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 538 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
538citing papers in PubMed
33.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

538 citing papers in PubMed, 1,116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel KRAS-G12D inhibitors.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. ACS central science · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

478 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph J WienkenDepartment of Physics and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Amalienstrasse 54, Munich 80799, Germany.
Philipp Baaske
Ulrich Rothbauer
Dieter Braun
Stefan Duhr
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENanoTemper Technologies (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein interactions inside the human body are expected to differ from the situation in vitro. This is crucial when investigating protein functions or developing new drugs. In this study, we present a sample-efficient, free-solution method, termed microscale thermophoresis, that is capable of analysing interactions of proteins or small molecules in biological liquids such as blood serum or cell lysate. The technique is based on the thermophoresis of molecules, which provides information about molecule size, charge and hydration shell. We validated the method using immunologically relevant systems including human interferon gamma and the interaction of calmodulin with calcium. The affinity of the small-molecule inhibitor quercetin to its kinase PKA was determined in buffer and human serum, revealing a 400-fold reduced affinity in serum. This information about the influence of the biological matrix may allow to make more reliable conclusions on protein functionality, and may facilitate more efficient drug development.

Indexed as

Biological AssayCalmodulinHumansInterferon-gammaProtein BindingProteinsCalmodulinInterferon-gammaProteins

Identifiers

PMID20981028
OpenAlexW2146103350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.