Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20980638›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2010

Is soy consumption good or bad for the breast?

Leena Hilakivi-Clarke, Juan E Andrade, William Helferich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nutritional Genomics and Cancer Prevention.Cancer treatment and research · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Androgen receptor and soy isoflavones in prostate cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leena Hilakivi-ClarkeLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. clarkel@georgetown.edu
Juan E Andrade
William Helferich
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

PHYTOESTROGENS AND AGING: DOSE, TIMING &TISSUEP01AG024387 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HELFERICH, WILLIAM G · 2004 to 2008
$7.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA000970NIA NIH HHS P01 AG024387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genistein in soy activates estrogen receptor (ER)-α and ERβ and acts as an estradiol in multiple target tissues. Because estrogens increase breast cancer risk and genistein promotes the growth of ER-positive human breast cancer cells, it has remained unclear whether this isoflavone or soy is safe. Results reviewed here suggest that women consuming moderate amounts of soy throughout their life have lower breast cancer risk than women who do not consume soy; however, this protective effect may originate from soy intake early in life. We also review the literature regarding potential risks genistein poses for breast cancer survivors. Findings obtained in 2 recent human studies show that a moderate consumption of diet containing this isoflavone does not increase the risk of breast cancer recurrence in Western women, and Asian breast cancer survivors exhibit better prognosis if they continue consuming a soy diet. The mechanisms explaining the breast cancer risk-reducing effect of early soy intake or the protective effect in Asian breast cancer survivors remain to be established. We propose that the reduction in risk involves epigenetic changes that result in alterations in the expression of genes that regulate mammary epithelial cell fate, i.e. cell proliferation and differentiation. Lifetime soy consumption at a moderate level may prevent breast cancer recurrence through mechanisms that change the biology of tumors; e.g. women who consumed soy during childhood develop breast cancers that express significantly reduced Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 levels. More research is needed to understand why soy intake during early life may both reduce breast cancer risk and risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

Glycine maxBreastBreast NeoplasmsHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20980638
PMCPMC2981011
OpenAlexW2169917918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.