Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20980625›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2011

Sodium/glucose cotransporter-1, sweet receptor, and disaccharidase expression in the intestine of the domestic dog and cat: two species of different dietary habit.

D J Batchelor, M Al-Rammahi, A W Moran, J G Brand, X Li, M Haskins, A J German, S P Shirazi-Beechey

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Glucose transporters in the small intestine in health and disease.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Managing feline diabetes: current perspectives.Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Training the Gut for Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Sodium-glucose cotransport.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Comparative digestive physiology.Comprehensive Physiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D J BatchelorDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.
M Al-Rammahi
A W Moran
J G Brand
X Li
M Haskins
A J German
S P Shirazi-Beechey
University of Liverpool · GBMonell Chemical Senses Center · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilOCPHP CDC HHS PR02512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestic cat (Felis catus), a carnivore, naturally eats a very low carbohydrate diet. In contrast, the dog (Canis familiaris), a carno-omnivore, has a varied diet. This study was performed to determine the expression of the intestinal brush border membrane sodium/glucose cotransporter, SGLT1, sweet receptor, T1R2/T1R3, and disaccharidases in these species adapted to contrasting diets. The expression (this includes function) of SGLT1, sucrase, maltase and lactase were determined using purified brush border membrane vesicles and by quantitative immunohistochemistry of fixed tissues. The pattern of expression of subunits of the sweet receptor T1R2 and T1R3 was assessed using fluorescent immunohistochemistry. In proximal, middle, and distal small intestine, SGLT1 function in dogs was 1.9- to 2.3-fold higher than in cats (P = 0.037, P = 0.0011, P = 0.027, respectively), and SGLT1 protein abundance followed an identical pattern. Both cats and dogs express T1R3 in a subset of intestinal epithelial cells, and dogs, but not cats, express T1R2. In proximal and middle regions, there were 3.1- and 1.6-fold higher lactase (P = 0.006 and P = 0.019), 4.4- and 2.9-fold higher sucrase (both P < 0.0001), and 4.6- and 3.1-fold higher maltase activity (P = 0.0026 and P = 0.0005), respectively, in the intestine of dogs compared with cats. Dogs have a potential higher capacity to digest and absorb carbohydrates than cats. Cats may suffer from carbohydrate malabsorption following ingestion of high-carbohydrate meals. However, dogs have a digestive ability to cope with diets containing significant levels of carbohydrate.

Indexed as

DietAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCarbohydrate MetabolismCatsDisaccharidasesDogsFemaleGlucoseIntestinal MucosaMaleMicrovilliMolecular Sequence DataReceptors, Cell SurfaceSodium-Glucose Transporter 1DisaccharidasesGlucoseReceptors, Cell SurfaceSodium-Glucose Transporter 1

Identifiers

PMID20980625
PMCPMC3023277
OpenAlexW2016821598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.