Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20980603›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

Two distinct modes of PERIOD recruitment onto dCLOCK reveal a novel role for TIMELESS in circadian transcription.

Woo Chul Sun, Eun Hee Jeong, Hyun-Jeong Jeong, Hyuk Wan Ko, Isaac Edery, Eun Young Kim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Woo Chul SunNeuroscience Graduate Program, Institute for Medical Sciences, Ajou University School of Medicine, San5, Wonchon-dong, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hee Jeong
Hyun-Jeong Jeong
Hyuk Wan Ko
Isaac Edery
Eun Young Kim
Ajou University · KRAdvanced Pharma · US

Funding

CLOCK MECHANISM UNDERLYING RHYTHMIC BEHAVIORR01NS034958 · NINDS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI EDERY, ISAAC · 1995 to 2016
$5.5M
NINDS NIH HHS NS03958NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative transcriptional feedback loops are a core feature of eukaryotic circadian clocks and are based on rhythmic interactions between clock-specific repressors and transcription factors. In Drosophila, the repression of dCLOCK (dCLK)-CYCLE (CYC) transcriptional activity by dPERIOD (dPER) is critical for driving circadian gene expression. Although growing lines of evidence indicate that circadian repressors such as dPER function, at least partly, as molecular bridges that facilitate timely interactions between other regulatory factors and core clock transcription factors, how dPER interacts with dCLK-CYC to promote repression is not known. Here, we identified a small conserved region on dPER required for binding to dCLK, termed CBD (for dCLK binding domain). In the absence of the CBD, dPER is unable to stably associate with dCLK and inhibit the transcriptional activity of dCLK-CYC in a simplified cell culture system. CBD is situated in close proximity to a region that interacts with other regulatory factors such as the DOUBLETIME kinase, suggesting that complex architectural constraints need to be met to assemble repressor complexes. Surprisingly, when dPER missing the CBD (dPER(ΔCBD)) was evaluated in flies the clock mechanism was operational, albeit with longer periods. Intriguingly, the interaction between dPER(ΔCBD) and dCLK is TIM-dependent and modulated by light, revealing a novel and unanticipated in vivo role for TIM in circadian transcription. Finally, dPER(ΔCBD) does not provoke the daily hyperphosphorylation of dCLK, indicating that direct interactions between dPER and dCLK are necessary for the dCLK phosphorylation program but are not required for other aspects of dCLK regulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBlotting, WesternCells, CulturedCircadian RhythmCLOCK ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsImmunohistochemistryLightMotor ActivityPeriod Circadian ProteinsPhosphorylationPlasmidsProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsClk protein, DrosophilaCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, DrosophilaRepressor ProteinsRNAtim protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID20980603
PMCPMC2997764
OpenAlexW2135084395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.